It was midway through the second quarter of Game Five when I came to an abrupt realization: I was feeling extremely calm, collected, and—most of all—confident.
Confident as the Cavs defense continued to smother the Celtics. Confident as the ball moved around the court on offense. Confident as LeBron James drove and dished and shot as well as he possibly could.
Could they be turning the corner? I thought after James’ nifty little step-back jumper gave the team a 14-point lead. Are they really doing this?
Reality flattened me like a 98-mile-per-hour fastball careening toward my head. And credit Rajon Rondo—plus numerous Cavs mental and physical errors—for bringing that about.
Rondo nailed two three-pointers, also assisting two other baskets, to spark a 14-3 Celtics run over the final three-and-a-half minutes of the second quarter. The Cavs had dared him all series to take those shots; he did, and tonight he made them.
Kevin Garnett continued to show his range on outside jumpers and Paul Pierce shook off a sluggish start—forcing shot after shot—and hit some big free throws down the stretch.
The Celtics also hammered Cleveland on the boards, claiming a 38-30 advantage overall and—most importantly—12-7 on the offensive glass. The Cavs thrive on offensive rebounds, and keeping the other team away from the offensive glass. But tonight, collectively, Cleveland’s group of post players were outworked, outhustled, outplayed, and LeBron only grabbed three rebounds himself.
(Zydrunas Ilgauskas has been a non-factor for two games in a row. I don't like that one bit. Not at all.)
The Cavs also shot themselves in the foot with their woes at the free-throw line. It’s one thing to get to the line; it’s another to actually punish the opponent by sinking them. Shooting 68 percent from the line and missing 13 free throws isn’t going to cut it, especially not on the road.
In particular, the Cavs shot just 3-for-8 from the line in what proved to be the decisive third quarter. With the offensive quagmire, you have to convert on a higher percentage to keep yourself in the game. By missing five-of-eight, the Cavs went from “facing a moderate deficit” at the end of the quarter to “barely holding on by a thread.”
(I don’t know what’s more inept in Cleveland right now: the Cavs offense on the road or the Indians offense, period. Can the Browns let Rob Chudzinski help the other teams out?)
Sixteen turnovers also spelled trouble for the Cavs. It wasn’t necessarily the number, but just how they came about. Three shot-clock violations—yikes. Two terrible miscues to start the second half—Delonte West slipping on the first possession and throwing a terrible pass, followed by an awful pass from LeBron—just gave Boston five free points. Inexcusable mistakes at this point in the season.
Miraculously, the Cavs nearly rallied from an 11-point deficit in the final three-and-a-half minutes. If you’re a Celtics fan, you have to be absolutely horrified at your team’s execution down the stretch. The closing minutes reminded me of a college game, and there’s no doubt in my mind that if Wally Szczerbiak hit that trey (which would have cut the deficit to three with about 1:30 left) that the Cavs would have won the game.
Another point for concern for Celtics fans: the Cavs could have legitimately won all three of these games in Boston. Game 1 was, well, awful, but still there for the taking. In Game Two, the Cavs blew a 12-point lead. And tonight, they blew a 14-point lead.
My point is, the Cavs (and potentially the Pistons and whatever Western Conference team emerges) aren’t the Atlanta Hawks. Real teams aren’t scared of playing in the TD Banknorth Dunkin’ Donuts Liberty Mutual Garden. This series could be over.
Alright. Enough racking my brain for tonight. At least the Indians won. And at least there’s about a 97.2 percent chance that the Cavs will have one more shot to crack the Celtics in Boston.

















comments (5) write a comment »
write a new comment
2 months ago
As a Celtics fan, those 12- and 14-point leads you mention are just because the Cavs happened to outscore the C's early. The Celtics just went on their run later in the game, when it mattered more.
I could easily say the games would be blowouts if the Celtics could get off to better starts, as starting the game well is still important. So I'm not concerned in the way you suggest in that graf. In fact, you Cavs fans should be more concerned your team can't hold leads.
I'm with you on pretty much everything else, though.
from 2 months ago
First off, thanks for the edits/suggestions Tim.
What's just frustrating for Cavs fans is that every time it seems this team takes a step forward - Game 5 last year in Detroit, recovering to win Games 3 & 4 this series and holding a double-digit lead in this one last night - we yack it away. The biggest knock on this Cavs team is a lack of killer instinct and that they're mentally soft. We're up 14 with three minutes to go before halftime, and it took less than five (game) minutes to give it away, and then some.
Being up 14 and with the crowd a nonfactor, the mentality should have been "Let's do everything we can to get this to 20 before half" instead of "Let's just keep this lead". It was a mental letdown more than anything else, and the unforced turnovers to start the second half...ugggggghhhhh.
Hats off to Rondo. I knew he wasn't an outside shooter but I didn't realize that he'd only made like six 3's all season. Big shots there.
2 months ago
It was only the second quarter but those Rondo jumpers were incredibly clutch and really gave a shot in the arm to Boston. Plus the Celtics were more physical than Cleveland and their stars played better than LeBron did.
Still, how many horrible mistakes did Boston make down the stretch that nearly cost them the game? I still question Boston's resolve against a poised, multi-faceted squad like the Pistons. Heck, I still question their resolve to win a game in Cleveland...
2 months ago
hi scott. i am a celtics fan, but i just wanted to what a good article this was. well written, funny, well thought out, well researched. well done, my man!
2 months ago
As a Cavs fan the fact that they can not play with a big lead is incredibly frustrating. To have to killer instinct is unforgivable. You can't take your foot off the throats of a very talented team like the Celtics.
write a new comment