Do Something, David Stern: One-and-Done Practice is Lose/Lose for NCAA and NBA

Chris Conrad discusses why kids coming out of college creates no good for the Universities, the NBA, or the kids themselves.

by Chris Conrad (Scribe)

9

322 reads

Editorial

May 14, 2008

NBA, College Basketball, David Stern, Editorial

Share this Story

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Email

The coming and going of players is normal these days. It is socially acceptable for high school athletes to go to college for one year, then think it is all about the money, and jump right to the NBA where millions of dollars are handed to a 18-year-old kid. Hence, his being a kid.

Most parents these days can't trust kids with $20 these days because most insist on drinking, drugs, or other illegal activities that will hurt an athlete in the future.

It used to be worse when kids wouldn’t even get one year of college. Where one minute you’re under the supervision of your mom and dad and high school, and the next minute you’re under the bright lights, living as an independent 18-year-old.

Who knows what goes on in the houses of some of these NBA players? I just wish David Stern would wake up and smell the coffee.

The NBA front office should get out their pen and paper when it comes to their age limit. The NFL makes high school athletes pick a college, and make that there home for the next two years, and usually three or four years.

The NFL system is working. Kids are getting an education and realizing that college is helping them in the real world. Kids these days just cannot be trusted in the real world. I think the most stressful job in America is that of a division one college basketball coach.

Rewind 20 years. You sign a top-50 recruit and you knew he was going to be there for the next two to four years because education was just the same as fame and money. Kids loved college. They loved winning and bringing tradition to their school.

Just imagine if kids had left after their first year when college basketball started. Basketball schools like Duke, Kentucky, UCLA, and North Carolina would have no tradition, they wouldn’t have recognized players. Everyone would be noticed as the person who left after one year of college.

Why must professional athletes insist on being horrible role models for these kids? WHY? I understand if $25 million came knocking it would be hard to resist. But to come back and enjoy the college life and college campus for three more years would be a dream come true.

Kids across America should be honored to represent a top notch school. Sadly, it’s a nightmare for kids. Most of them don’t know any better. Some were raised in families that didn’t have a lot of money, so when millions of dollars are offered, it's hard not to take it.

I respect Division two and three players. They play not because they are talented. Don’t get me wrong, most, if not all have talent. But not the talent that D-1 players are handed.

Division two and three players play because they love the game of basketball—they don’t play for the fame. They don’t get articles written about them or have interviews after the game. They play because when they step on the court, they know they are representing the game of basketball in every way.

The same with Division two and three coaches. They coach because they love it. They don’t get the OJ Mayos or Derrick Roses of today, they just get kids who want to learn and want to get better each and every day.

So David Stern, make something of this league. Make kids go to college for two years and preferably three years. Make kids get better on the court and off the court.

It's not just a basketball league anymore, it’s a respect league, and not too many 18-year-olds are going to make the right decision with $2 million in their hands.

Editorial

322 views

Share:

  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

comments (9) write a comment »

  1. I agree

    This is a great articile

    How old are you?

  2. Thanks Matt. I am over 30...I hope that's enough. :P

    1. Joking...obviously I didn't write this. LOL

  3. HAHA
    yea that is a little creepy
    I think he didnt mean it like that though

    What do you think of this Curly?

  4. HAHA
    yea that is a little creepy
    I think he didnt mean it like that though

    What do you think of this Curly?

  5. this matt guy is creepy?

    Stop postin the same stuff i am dude

  6. sorry bout that

    but relax both of you
    I didnt mean it like that

    just simply wanted to talk sports

  7. High school kids who were going to the league were the exception, not the rule. If they had the latent talent to excel (Lebron, Garnett, Kobe, T-Mac, etc) why SHOULD they go to college? I'm not endorsing kids not get an education, but if their dream came to them with a guaranteed contract and millions in endorsement, I'm sure they'd have little to regret in their mansions and driving their sports cars.

    If they have the actual physical talents (and remember, this is the infinitesimal minority), I say take the contract. Within maybe 4 or 5 years they would have made more money than most other people on earth make in multiple lifetimes. Plus, better to get to the league and get a contract now then get injured and have your career end before it starts in college ball.

    This is sports, people. It is inherently physical, and if someone is physically AND mentally (and adulthood comes at 18) ready, who the hell are we to tell them not to feed their families?

  8. you make no sense fukudome

write a new comment


Edit this Article Article History

About the Author Chris Conrad (scribe)

  • 11 articles written
  • 18 comments posted
  • 2 fans

Want to write for Bleacher Report

We are a community of fans who write about sports. And we're growing.

Learn More and Sign Up »