Ortiz, Ramirez Exposed As Latest Steroid Scandal Rocks Red Sox Nation

Drip. Drip. Drip. 

Another day, another name revealed.  David Ortiz and Manny Ramirez, the potent one-two punch from the 2003-2008 Boston Red Sox, are the latest drips from MLB’s leaky faucet: the infamous 2003 anonymous drug test.  Excuse me, while I yawn.

Only Brett Favre comeback stories are more repetitive and less interesting than baseball’s steroids saga.  Haven't we been down this same road enough times already? 

The script certainly hasn’t changed:  Star player gets exposed.  Star player issues awkward PR-manufactured denial.  Media feigns shock and outrage.  Fans get upset.  Fans and media jointly anoint new “clean savior of sport.” 

Time passes and “clean savior of sport” is exposed.  Repeat from start.  Enough already, who cares?

Amazingly, four and a half years have passed since 2005’s infamous Congressional hearing on steroids in baseball.  Countless stars have been revealed yet somehow steroid use is still making headlines.  So what have we learned, if anything, since the day Mark McGwire refused to talk about the past?

A) Lots of great baseball players used steroids.

From 1995 to 2005, 14 of the 22 MVP awards were won by players once linked to steroids.  Roger Clemens monopolized the Cy Young Award.  You’d be hard-pressed to find a star player who has avoided any whispers.  Name your favorite team’s three best players from this era.  Each has likely used performance enhancers at one point.

B) Lots of terrible baseball players used steroids.

The most forgotten aspect of the steroid era is the large number of losers who have been divulged as steroid users.  Jeremy Giambi, Larry Bigbie, Jason Christensen, Matt Franco, Cody McKay...the list continues for days.  Take one look at the list of players named in the Mitchell Report and it is obvious that steroid use was not exclusive to the game’s greats. 

Now given the fact that steroids are portrayed as miracle drugs that chemically created the careers of our generation’s superstars, it is interesting to note that these less-talented players did not ream the same benefits.  Were their drugs bad? 

Or could the effects of steroids possibly be overstated?  If the stars were still stars and the scrubs were still scrubs, maybe the playing field was more level than we were led to believe after all.

C) We have no way of knowing who used, who didn’t use, and what effect it had.

Power hitters juiced.  Contact hitters juiced.  Speedy Outfielders juiced.  Slap hitting middle-infielders juiced.  Strikeout pitchers juiced.  Control pitchers juiced.  Starting pitchers juiced.  Middle relievers juiced.  Closers juiced.  Stars juiced.  Scrubs juiced. 

Minor leaguers juiced.  College players juiced.  High school players juiced.  Big guys juiced.  Small guys juiced.  Players who got bigger juiced.  Players with no apparent change in physical-appearance juiced.  White players juiced.  Black players juiced.  Hispanic Players juiced.  Fan-favorites juiced.  Hated rivals juiced.  Winners juiced.  Losers juiced.  Good guys juiced.  Bad guys juiced. 

One of the biggest misconceptions of the era is that we can intuitively distinguish a steroid user.  We cannot.  Steroid users are impossible to typecast.  The drugs were used by players of all shapes and sizes for all different purposes: speed, power, recovery, health, etc. 

You're currently logged into Facebook

Do you want to share your Bleacher Report activity on Facebook?