There is nothing wrong with being hopeful.
There is no shame in being an optimist or leaving oneself open to the possibility of miracles.
Hope is why sports fans return season after season.
Hope is why we watch the games, even when we know the coach should be fired and the team has a three percent chance of making the postseason.
Hope is what fans do.
Hope is pretty much all Leaf fans have.
Over 2500 years ago (when the Leafs cup drought was but a few days old) the Stoic philosopher Epictetus summarized it best: When Thales was asked what is most universal, he answered, hope—for hope stays with those who have nothing else.
Hope may indeed be universal. It is altogether another thing for the men who run our favorite teams to predicate their plans or strategies on little more than hope or the remote likelihood of something positive happening.
And for far too long down at MLSE, it has seemed that hope was the cornerstone of this franchise: sign the high-risk UFA and hope for the best; trade for the goalie in decline and hope for a return to form.
Trade away draft pick after draft pick and hope to spackle over the lack of homegrown talent in the pipeline and ultimately, hope to make the post-season where anything can happen but seldom does...
With JFJ and Paul Maurice running the show, there didn't seem to be any discussion, consideration, or event recognition of the underlying principles that are required to transform a team from also-ran to elite status.
At MLSE, there didn't seem to be much transparency, understanding, or commitment to the cultural and institutional requirements of building a team that could eventually challenge for the Cup.
I'd like to think that changed this week with the ongoing house cleaning be carried out down at the ACC. Consider:
- John Ferguson Junior - arguably one of the worst GMs in Leafs history: Fired
- Paul Maurice - qualified for the post-season three years out of 11: Fired
- Randy Ladoceur - assistant coach and special teams failure: Fired
- Steve McKichan - Raycroft's goalie coach: Fired
- Dallas Eakins - assistant coach: Demoted
- Demoted Steve Penny - assistant GM: Demoted
And the reaction from the media to the return of accountability?
Given that no coverage of the Leafs can be filed without mentioning 1967, MLSE's greed and the need for qualified hockey men to run the team, one would think the media would react positively to the arrival of decisive leadership.
And you'd be wrong.
Of course, the media's reaction has nothing to do with currying favor and maintaining access.
It has nothing to do with trying to secure future book deals and inside sources.
It has nothing to do with the fact that for the first time in a long time the Leafs are controlling the message and limiting leaks.
Apparently, the media's current round of disdain for all things Leaf has everything to do with the quality of the men who were fired.
You know, the same fine men that have managed to make the Leafs one of just seven teams that hasn't qualified for the post-season since the lockout.
The same fine men that traded away the majority of their first round picks and coached the Leafs into 24th spot in the NHL with a 29th ranked penalty kill.
It is the same fine men that have steered the ship during the last four or five years of foundering.
The same fine men that have ensured that I will not be able to open a sports page nor turn on any TV sports coverage without being reminded of 1967, and my favorite team's failings for years and years to come.
I for one am happy that these allegedly fine men are no longer around to make a mess of my favorite team.
I am filled with hope that this marks the return of executive accountability and a turning point for the franchise.
But my real take-away is this: for every silver lining with the Toronto Maple Leafs, the media will find the black cloud.
All that's left to figure out is how Leaf fans are to blame for this one too.















comments (5) write a comment »
write a new comment
about 1 month ago
I see just as much overly positive Leafs media as I do overly negative.
The issue is that the T.O. media has zero objectivity, either positive or negative.
They act like every GM in the league is clamouring to take the Leaf GM job, speculating wildly about virtually every decent hockey man in the league whether they are currently under contract or not.
The Leafs media need to understand, and some of their fans as well, that the Leafs GM and coaching positions are not the "dream jobs" they make them out to be.
In fact, in many ways working for MLSE is a career killer.
People need to have reasonable expectations before they go around throwing everyone's name in the rumour mill for this "marquee job".
And although you say you hate the mention of MLSE in every article the fact remains that as long as that ownership structure is in place the Leafs are going nowhere.
about 1 month ago
Spencer,
Thanks for the comments.
While I agree that the T.O. media are not the most objective bunch, I'd love to know who the overly positive media are when it comes to Leafs coverage. I'm saturated by Leafs media coverage and quite frankly, I don't see anything positive coming out in any of it.
Yes, MLSE has certainly had its faults in how the Leafs have been run to date. But, their firing of JFJ, their handling of Colangelo and Peddie's resignation as President of the Leafs are all indicative of an ownership group that, for once, might be trending in the right direction.
about 1 month ago
The mere fact that the T.O. media thinks that every decent hockey man from Brian Burke to Jim Nill to Scotty Bowman is going to bend over backwards to take the Leafs GM job is a clear indication of how wildly optimistic they can get.
As for MLSE turning things around, I can definitely see the positives in what has transpired over the last few weeks from a Leafs fan perspective, but surely you know as well as I do that so long as Peddie and the teachers are in charge the Leafs are going to remain dysfunctional.
A pension fund by its very definition looks for safe, moderate growth investments, and so long as the Leafs keep raking in the money regardless of the product on the ice they have no need to change anything.
Blind loyalty is not always a constructive thing for sports fans.
If I were a Leafs fan I would be hoping for a billionaire hockey fan to buy out the team, single ownership seems to be what works best in pro sports.
about 1 month ago
I'm thinking, no GM, no captain and no coach are all good things for this organization. Start new! Of course, it all depends on who is brought in to fill those respective roles.
about 1 month ago
Excellent comments MF.
What truly irritates me about the Leaf media is the constant blame they lay on the fans and the support we offer in the best and worst of times. I am no business guru but it seems to me that while the team makes loads of money, I have no doubt more playoffs = more money and such a business oriented team surely has the capacity to work that equation out.
The other quirk I've noticed with the media is how the newspapers continue to write stories about how the Leafs receive too much coverage...
I don't quite get how they think and operate.
write a new comment