What Can Indiana Pacers Expect from Rodney Stuckey?

Stephen Babb@@StephenBabbFeatured ColumnistJuly 20, 2014

MIAMI, FL - DECEMBER 03: Rodney Stuckey #3 of the Detroit Pistons looks on during a game against the Miami Heat at American Airlines Arena on December 3, 2013 in Miami, Florida. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory copyright notice:  (Photo by Mike Ehrmann/Getty Images)
Mike Ehrmann/Getty Images

On paper, the Indiana Pacers have taken a step back.

The size of that step will determine how competitive the franchise remains in an Eastern Conference where talent has been dramatically reshuffled.

Per ESPN The Magazine's Chris Broussard, "Free-agent guard Lance Stephenson will play for the Charlotte Hornets for the next three seasons. His contract is worth $27 million, league sources said."

Whether that's a blessing or curse for these Pacers likely depends on how important things such as maturity and chemistry are to a winning equation. Stephenson was talented, but he was also a distraction. At times, his antics seemed to outweigh his production—a cost team president Larry Bird and Co. could ill afford.

Stephenson's ostensible replacement should entail significantly less drama. 

USA Today's Sam Amick reported that, "Rodney Stuckey has agreed to sign with the Indiana Pacers on a one-year deal for the veteran's minimum salary, according to a person with knowledge of the situation."

Per ESPN.com, "ESPN's Marc Stein first reported the Pacers' interest in Stuckey to replace Lance Stephenson, who signed with the Charlotte Hornets."

CHARLOTTE, NC - JULY 18: Charlotte Hornets announce the signing of Lance Stephenson to the media at Time Warner Cable Arena on July 18, 2014 in Charlotte, North Carolina.  NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or us
Kent Smith/Getty Images

So the first thing we can infer about Stuckey is that he isn't exactly a gold digger. He clearly picked the Pacers because he wanted the opportunity to win. Seven seasons with the Detroit Pistons will do that to a guy.

"We just kept in contact with (the Pacers) throughout the whole free agency process," Stuckey said after reaching a deal, according to IndyStar's Candace Buckner. "They always showed interest in me and once Lance decided to go to Charlotte, I thought it was just a good opportunity for me to come in and just be in a good situation with a great team."

Stuckey is coming for the right reasons, a good thing for Indiana's uneven chemistry and culture.

It should be slightly more focused on the bottom line this season...and less on blowing in guys' ears.

But intangibles only go so far. The Pacers will need Stuckey to make serious contributions, lest they lose a step to teams such as the Chicago Bulls, Washington Wizards or Cleveland Cavaliers.

The good news is the 28-year-old is probably better than advertised. His minutes have steadily declined since 2009-10 when he averaged a career-high 16.6 points per contest to go along with 4.8 assists and 3.8 rebounds.

Last season, Stuckey tallied 13.9 points and just 2.1 assists per game. Still, Stuckey is a good ball-handler whose 23.5 usage rate ranked 11th among shooting guards. He also got to the free-throw line four times a game, tied for 12th among shooting guards.

Getting to the charity stripe partially makes up for the fact that Stuckey isn't a very good three-point shooter. If there's one thing that doesn't sit right about this deal, it's that the Pacers really needed another shooter to spread the floor with emerging star Paul George.

Stuckey won't do that, but he does make things happen.

It's just not quite like Lance Stephenson.

Stuckey made only 43.6 percent of his field-goal attempts last season, a downgrade from Stephenson's 49.1 percent. Lance was also the better three-point shooter by a wide margin. As CBSSports.com's Zach Harper noted, "[Stuckey is] a horrible 3-point shooter, making only 28.6 of his attempts in his career, but he's been a solid scorer outside of that."

Then there are the energy things, Stephenson's 7.2 rebounds per contest. There's his playmaking and 4.6 assists per game.

Stuckey won't replace all that.

He only played 26.7 minutes per game last his season, so his numbers deserve context. Stephenson averaged over 35 minutes a game. 

Stuckey's prominence in the lineup will likely depend on whether the Pacers are finished making moves this summer—and what becomes of free agent Evan Turner, who's reportedly drawn interest from the Boston Celtics and Minnesota Timberwolves, according to ESPN's Jeff Goodman (via Matt Moore of CBS Sports).

He certainly fills a rotational niche, taking some of the ball-handling pressure off George Hill and giving Frank Vogel another playmaker who can operate the pick-and-roll. 

Until Indiana adds some depth on the wing, Stuckey figures to get plenty of chances. And our expectations for what he does with those chances should be measured. Stuckey isn't the worst thing for the Pacers, but it's unclear that really puts a title within closer reach.

At the moment, the Pacers aren't better. They could be on their way to more stability and maturity. But on the floor, Indiana needs some scorers, some difference-makers. 

DENVER, CO - January 17: C.J. Miles #0 of the Cleveland Cavaliers making a layup during a game against the Denver Nuggets on January 17, 2014 at the Pepsi Center in Denver, Colorado. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloadin
Garrett Ellwood/Getty Images

To that end, the organization also signed C.J. Miles this summer, hoping to address some of those perimeter shooting needs at the very least. Miles made 39.3 percent of his three-point attempts for the Cleveland Cavaliers last season and averaged 9.9 points in just 19.3 minutes per game.

Between Miles and Stuckey, the Pacers will have some weapons on the wing.

That doesn't mean they won't miss Lance.

Indiana has become a slightly deeper team, but it's hard to see who steps out during the postseason. Besides the obvious—and significant—contributions from George, who will the Pacers lean on? David West can only do so much. And who knows which Roy Hibbert will show up?

Stephenson could make the timely plays and inject life into a sometimes sputtering offense. 

If Stuckey's going to do the same, he'll have to reclaim his form from 2009-10. In all fairness, a change of scenery might help. There were things working against him in Detroit, as noted by The Detroit News' Vincent Goodwill:

We can debate what was the biggest reason Stuckey didn’t fulfill the promise the organization saw in him: if it was the six coaches in seven years, the fact Stuckey never appeared to want the burden or the pressure of being 'The Man' or if the organization was never stable enough with positive influences who would allow Stuckey to grow and flourish.

Stuckey may benefit from the stability and consistent messaging in Indiana. 

Maybe having a legitimate shot at the NBA Finals will bring out the best of him. There are certainly reasons for optimism, however speculative.

But there's also something to prove. There are Lance Stephenson's shoes to fill.

That won't be easy.


    How Harden and the Rockets Keep Hunting Steph

    NBA logo

    How Harden and the Rockets Keep Hunting Steph

    Zach Lowe
    via ESPN.com

    Klay Guarantees He'll 'Be Better' in Game 3

    NBA logo

    Klay Guarantees He'll 'Be Better' in Game 3

    Mike Chiari
    via Bleacher Report

    Morris Says He Did a 'S--t Job' Guarding LeBron

    NBA logo

    Morris Says He Did a 'S--t Job' Guarding LeBron

    Scott Polacek
    via Bleacher Report

    Realistic FA Targets for Eliminated Playoff Teams

    NBA logo

    Realistic FA Targets for Eliminated Playoff Teams

    Grant Hughes
    via Bleacher Report