Five Big Reasons Why Federer/Roddick Was Better Than Federer/Nadal

Alexeiv Goodenov by Correspondent Written on July 06, 2009
Previous Next

Slide 1 of 8

Display_image

In sports, the nostalgia of a theme often overtakes the true meaning of an accomplishment.

If this were not true, you would not hear so many sports fans calling a player overrated or underrated, and you would not be reading article after article reminding people of a remarkable event that the general public seems to have forgotten.

After watching the Federer vs. Roddick Wimbledon Final, I expected, unlike some, a close match, perhaps not a five set match, but a strong effort from both Roddick and Federer.

I got a match of a lifetime, and there were certain facts about the match that I feel support it over the previous year's Final as the greatest match ever played, at least at Wimbledon, and at least in the Open Era.

The following slides entail why I feel it was better than Federer vs. Nadal.

Once again, enjoy.

(2)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

35 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

1,297
reads

35
comments

written on July 06, 2009 Opinion

The best newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address