In sports, the nostalgia of a theme often overtakes the true meaning of an accomplishment.
If this were not true, you would not hear so many sports fans calling a player overrated or underrated, and you would not be reading article after article reminding people of a remarkable event that the general public seems to have forgotten.
After watching the Federer vs. Roddick Wimbledon Final, I expected, unlike some, a close match, perhaps not a five set match, but a strong effort from both Roddick and Federer.
I got a match of a lifetime, and there were certain facts about the match that I feel support it over the previous year's Final as the greatest match ever played, at least at Wimbledon, and at least in the Open Era.
The following slides entail why I feel it was better than Federer vs. Nadal.
Once again, enjoy.
35 Comments
Loading more comments...
This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete