Ron Artest vs. Trevor Ariza: Why the Lakers are Better Off with Ron-Ron

Greg Buschow by Contributor Written on July 03, 2009
LOS ANGELES, CA - MAY 17:  Kobe Bryant #24 of the Los Angeles Lakers hugs Ron Artest #96 of the Houston Rockets after the Lakers defeated the Rockets 89-70 in Game Seven of the Western Conference Semifinals during the 2009 NBA Playoffs at Staples Center on May 17, 2009 in Los Angeles, California. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement.  (Photo by Stephen Dunn/Getty Images) (Photo by Stephen Dunn/Getty Images)

Is it possible for a team to lose a top free agent and actually get better?  Well, not usually, but in this instance the Lakers appear to have done just that.

On Thursday, former Lakers small forward Trevor Ariza signed a five-year, $33 million deal with the Houston Rockets.  Before the ink was even dry on the contract,  former Rockets small forward Ron Artest had agreed to sign with the Lakers.

The deal, although terms have not been disclosed, is rumored to be three years at the mid-level exception (just under $6 million per year).

So how are the Lakers better?

Ariza certainly improved his three-point shooting in the playoffs this past season, but is that a lasting improvement?  He improved it over the regular season as well, but in the playoffs he took it to yet another level. 

Also, Ariza was among the league leaders in steals this past season, including some key steals in the playoffs, some of which led directly to Laker wins.  Make no mistake about it: Ariza has improved by leaps and bounds and he's still only 23 years old.

It will be interesting down the road to see if he can sustain and continue to improve or if he just flourished as a role player in the right role on the right team.  Either way, from a Lakers perspective, Ariza will be missed.

Simply put, Ron Artest makes the Lakers tougher.  While Ariza was great at steals and stepping into the passing lanes in the open court, Artest is a premier lock down, one-on-one defender.  He can be put on the opposing team's best shooter and take pressure off Kobe Bryant on the defensive end of the floor. 

Less energy spent by Bryant on defense?  Well, we all know what that will mean for a player who's already arguably the best closer in the NBA.  Artest also has a knack for getting into the heads of opposing players and taking their minds out of the game. Lesser concentration means lesser performance.

On the offensive end, while Artest's outside shot appears to be quite streaky, as far as percentages go, Artest is a better three-point shooter than Ariza. Ariza is more of a slasher.

There's nothing wrong with that, but in the playoffs defenses get tougher and most of the teams that survive that long have a presence in the paint that makes it much more difficult to get to the basket. 

Artest is much bigger and stronger.  He is an outstanding post player.  He creates matchup problems and can draw double teams down low, leaving openings for other players. His style is much more suited to playoff basketball than that of Ariza.

Some may say that the Lakers are worse because Artest is a hot head, a distraction, or a cancer in the locker room.  I say, if Phil Jackson can Handle Dennis Rodman, he can certainly handle Artest. 

Also, Artest has a lot of respect for Kobe Bryant, the biggest factor in keeping someone on the right page is to have their respect. Bryant's resume speaks for itself.

Artest is getting older now and what every player wants before he leaves this great game is a ring.  Ron doesn't have one yet.  I say he'll be playing this year with his eyes on the prize instead of his head in the clouds.

Vote Now! - Author Poll

How does the Artest/Ariza switch effect the Lakers chance to repeat?

  • They are better with Artest
  • They were better with Ariza
  • Either one. Their chances remain the same
vote to see results
Results - Author Poll

How does the Artest/Ariza switch effect the Lakers chance to repeat?

  • They are better with Artest

    72.3%
  • They were better with Ariza

    13.3%
  • Either one. Their chances remain the same

    14.4%
  • Total votes: 195
(0)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

11 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

1,326
reads

11
comments

written on July 03, 2009 Opinion

The best Lakers newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.