All we've really read and heard so far is the speculation on whether or not this was a case of the Lakers being cheap or Ariza's agent being greedy. My question is: Does any of that even matter? We will never know the dirty details.
ESPN and other may think they have the inside track on who's fault this is but the reality is that in any negotiations, it takes two to tango. Personally, I'll expose my bias and lean more toward Ariza's agent in light of how he dealt with the Lakers with Bynum, whom he also represents.
I'd like to present an alternate take on this whole situation. I realize that in the NBA, agents are able to get maximum dollar for their clients because: 1) They get a portion of the proceeds, and
2) The players do not want to be taken advantage of so they are the middle grounds. Where else could Ariza have gone where he would have had a better chance of winning another ring? Perhaps Cleveland, but that's about it. And where does he go? To Houston, who are now rebuilding, and aren't gonna touch a ring anytime soon. Can he be on his own? Only time will tell.
He should have just taken the offer, 5-6 million a year is pretty good. Ariza was important, but he is not worth 7-10 a year. I love the guy and wish him well, but he should have just sucked it up and played for the Lakers again. Maybe after another year he could show that he's worth more (look at the stats, his numbers are not that great).
Meanwhile, Ron Artest is taking a pay cut. A pay cut. Why? Because he knows that the cut will be worth it, because of the ever elusive ring so many are hunting after. Will he be better than Ariza? Let's hope so. Let's hope he provides that toughness that everyone says he has. Let's hope he keeps his crazy antics in the past and that he mellows to the LA lifestyle. But , as with everything in sports, only time will tell.
Like the new article format? Send us feedback!