Red Sox Pitching Grades are Solid Despite Month End Meltdown

Todd Civin by Columnist Written on July 02, 2009
NEW YORK - MAY 04:  Jon Lester #31 of the Boston Red Sox deals a pitch against the New York Yankees on May 4, 2009 at Yankee Stadium in the Bronx borough of New York City. The Red Sox defeated the Yankees 6-4.  (Photo by Jim McIsaac/Getty Images) (Photo by Jim McIsaac/Getty Images)

Had Tuesday night's 11-10 implosion against the last place Baltimore Orioles happened in July instead of in June, the Boston Red Sox pitching staff would have earned Magna Cum Laude for the month.

After weathering a 71-minute rain delay and building the lead to 10-1, and before being replaced on the field by their Triple A affiliates, the pitching staff closes the month with a big check-minus next to their names.

Aside from last night, however, the Red Sox staff has clearly established itself as the premier staff in the American League. The starting rotation, minus Daisuke Matsuzaka, has been solid and the bullpen, minus last night's aberration, has been lights out. 

Should the pitching staff continue to be as solid as it was during the month of June, the rest of the American League East will be looking up at Boston as the summer progresses.

Here are the pitching grades for the month of June:

 

Josh Beckett: A (Last Month: B)

Beckett has once again established himself as the ace he was in 2007. For the month of June, Beckett was 4-1 with 1.51 ERA. He struck out 35 in 35 innings and averaged seven innings per start. He held batters to a .195 batting average and surrendered only .81 WHIP.

For the season, he is 9-3, while he was 7-5 after June last season. In the Sox championship year of 2007, Beckett was 11-2 after June on his way to a 20-7 campaign.

 

Tim Wakefield: A- (Last Month: A-)

What more can you say about Wakefield, who won his 10th game of the year in June, matching his total of last year? The scary thing is that he can lose it as quickly as he gained it. Knock on wood, Wakefield may make his first All-Star game in his 17th season. His last start tied him with Roger Clemens for most games started in franchise history.

Wakefield cruised through June at 4-0 with 3.45 ERA, his game of the month being a 1-0 six inning, three-hit gem against the Atlanta Braves. As long as his back holds up and he doesn't lose the magic of the knuckler, Wakefield will clearly be the best No. 4 starter in baseball.

 

Jon Lester: A- (Last Month: C-)
Lester finally makes the grade that earned him the preseason Cy Young accolades with a 3-1 record and 1.85 ERA for the month of June. After a rocky first two months of the season, Lester has become the skilled corner painter that he was throughout last season's 16-6 campaign.
For June, he was nearly unhittable, holding batters to .189 batting average and striking out 40 in 34 innings of work. He gave up a total of seven runs in five starts, including two complete games.
Most importantly, both Lester and Beckett have established themselves as two dominating pitchers in a very strong starting five.

Brad Penny: B (Last Month: B-)
Penny was only 1-2 for the month of June, but had his best month to date in terms of ERA, posting 3.18 in five starts. Many Sox fans keep discussing Penny's name in trade talks, but at 6-3 pitching out of the No. 5 slot, he has perhaps become too valuable for the Sox to trade.
Matzuzaka's woes may turn out to be Penny's gain, as the Sox log jam in the rotation appears to
Single Page
(0)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

0 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

112
reads

0
comments

written on July 02, 2009 Rankings/List

The best Red Sox newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.