Test Cricket Discussions: ICC Talking About Four-Day Matches

Dann Khan by Analyst Written on June 30, 2009
CHESTER-LE-STREET, ENGLAND - MAY 18:  Tim Bresnan of England celebrates taking the final wicket to win the match during day five of the 2nd npower test match between England and West Indies at The Riverside on May 18, 2009 in Chester-le-Street, England.  (Photo by Julian Finney/Getty Images) (Photo by Julian Finney/Getty Images)
(Page 2 of 2)

Four-dayers, can clearly be seen as the main enemy of slow batting too. With time reducing, the batters have to score at a greater rate than they do today. So slow batters, no matter how high their averages might be, will have to be dropped.

Slow batting is an art of test cricket which can be crucial at times. So looking to eradicate it is to insult cricketing skill.

A similar situation will be for bowlers with good averages but average strike rates.

All these things clearly highlight the most important point: how the basic game structure is going to get destroyed.

ICC has not understood the fact that changes are very useful in improving the game for today's generation, but it is not good to shake the basic roots of the game.

Modifications have to be made. But shaking the fundamentals is blasphemous. And this new rule can shake of one of the main fundamentals: patience.

Some of the best moments in the game are based on patience and some of the worst are based on the lack of it.

Having day and night matches is such a good idea. Work on that. Work on these good ideas which would help the cricket fans see matches when they are actually free.

Change balls to facilitate this. Or do anything else that helps. But work on good.

Also, having four-day matches at first-class level makes more sense. The young guys are being prepared for tougher stages. Though if possible, I don't mind having at this level too.

So why is this being done?

Why doesn't the ICC realise that they have gain some popularity among real cricket enthusiasts (I don't think the 'fans' who just waste their time arguing when they have no basis for them are any threat to the ICC)?

And most importantly, ICC is there to protect the game and not to try and destroy its basic body because the beard wasn't matching with it.

I would much rather have the beard (t20 cricket) destroyed. But wanting this requires common sense.

(3)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

23 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

122
reads

23
comments

written on June 30, 2009 Opinion

Telegraph.co.uk Cricket News

Visit Telegraph.co.uk for more news.

The best newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.