Manchester United vs Chelsea in Moscow, it's an all-English final but to enforce a point made by Michel Platini and Sepp Blatter, it really can't be called an all-English final because not even half the players on the pitch will be from England.
Looking at Manchester United:
Edwin Van der Sar—Netherlands
Nemanja Vidic—Serbia
Patrice Evra—France
Anderson—Brazil
Cristiano Ronaldo—Portugal
Nani—Portugal
Carlos Tevez—Argentina
Wayne Rooney, Rio Ferdinand,Paul Scholes,Wes Brown, Michael Carrick and Owen Hargreaves are the only English players in the team. However, Ryan Giggs(Wales) and Darren Fletcher (Scotland) could be called "British" players.
Chelsea have foreign players in abundance:
Petr Cech—Czech Republic
Paulo Ferreira—Portugal
Alex—Brazil
Ricardo Carvalho—Portugal
Michael Essien—Ghana
John Obi Mikel—Nigeria
Claude Makelele—France
Michael Ballack—Germany
Florent Malouda—France
Didier Drogba and Salomon Kalou—Ivory Coast
Nicolas Anelka—France
Andriy Shevchenko—Ukraine
Frank Lampard, Joe Cole, Ashley Cole and John Terry appear to be the only Englishmen from the possible starters.
Looking at this, do you think the number of foreign players in a club should be reduced, restricted or limited in any way?
However, both teams are after all from England.













comments (16) write a comment »
write a new comment
2 months ago
Good Point Salaar I think it would help the england team if foreigners were restricted but wouldnt help the teams or the EPL.
2 months ago
What about Scholesy?! He got us there after all... :)
2 months ago
Also the "all-Italian" final in 2003 only had 11 Italians on the pitch (ie half) between the two teams and this year's should have around 9 or 10 English players so not much difference. And we all know who won the World Cup in 2006...!
2 months ago
Well written good point.
2 months ago
Worth mentioning that both clubs are AMERICAN owned with U.S. and Korean sponsors.
Nothing English about them at all actually....apart from the odd player or two.
from 2 months ago
Roman Abrahamovic is Russian..Bruce Buck(American is the chairman)
Thanks guys!
from 2 months ago
Russian ,American....anything but English.
2 months ago
So what? United are located in Manchester and Chelsea are located in London. In other words, they represent England.
This article is indirectly leading onto another subject, which the issue of "blaming foreigners for the national teams failure"....
Well written though as always Salaar..
from 2 months ago
This article also raises the whole question of globalization.........there is a Samsung factory located not far from where I live ...does that make them a Brazilian company?
from 2 months ago
I didnt understand that comment. Whats it got to do with football?
from 2 months ago
Well you said that the English clubs are English only because they are located in England.
Does that mean any company located in my country is Brazilian?
2 months ago
Thanks Salomon
2 months ago
Also there was 9 'foreigners' in the starting line ups of the all Spanish final in 2000 between Real Madrid and Valencia, so its hardly a new phenomena.
from 2 months ago
Hardly a new phenomena ....in Europe.
and maybe the US.
2 months ago
oh yeah, i get it now. But still, when a company is founded in England by English people, then it doesn't matter where that company sets up a branch. It always remains an English company...
Football clubs like Manchester United/City, Chelsea and Liverpool were founded In England by English people, so just because they are now owned by Americans, Russians or whatever else, they remain "English" clubs.....
The location point was meant to point out the fact that United was founded In England and have remained situated in England, Manchester. So i dont see how they all of a sudden become an "American" club, just because they are now owned by Americans...
from 2 months ago
Right. So now it`s not about location. It`s a company founded by a certain nationality remains under that nationality even if sold to another nationality. Got ya...makes sense. It`s all about who founded the thing never mind who owns it.
And I talk shit.
write a new comment