The debate over which conference is better than another in college football is one that has existed for years and no doubt will rage on forever. And there are many ways to compare the apples of one to the oranges of the other in an effort to arbitrarily determine superiority.
Overall team performance? Check. National champions? Way ahead of you. Player quality? Sure. Size of stadiums and lavishness of football facilities? Yup, that too.
Comparing leagues by their coaches is also a common approach to the "my conference is better than yours" battle, but it's usually done by looking at what each coach has accomplished. We've decided to take a different angle and tackle this dispute through a different statistic: stability.
Coaching turnover at the FBS level remains at a critically high level, with hirings, firings and bolting from one program to another more prevalent than ever before. That coach was great at one place, but how will he be at the next? And how long can he be expected to stick around?
Of the 128 schools set to play in FBS this fall, 48 of them have coaches in either their first or second year on the job. Two more (Louisville's Bobby Petrino and Mark Whipple of Massachusetts) are making their return to those programs after previously coaching there.
With almost constant newness, determining which conference is tops in terms of its coaches is a tough task to tackle. But we're nothing if not up for the challenge, so check out our power ranking of all 10 FBS conferences based on coaching stability.