The English Premier League Debate: Is It Really The Best?

Time and again at the end of every season this question comes up: is the EPL really the best league in terms of entertainment and quality of football?

The answer to this question can never be absolute or certain but definitely the general consensus is that it is ONE of the best leagues. The one question that subsequently follows this observation is—if this league has completed the transition from the relative to the superlative—i.e. from "one of the best leagues" to "The best league."

Opinions are varied and each argument comes very logically derived and nicely articulated to sound convincing. Here I take my stand on this matter.

The first criteria that judges a league is the entertainment it provides (though I have always maintained it should be the quality of football). Anyways, there can never be a shadow of a doubt that the EPL is definitely a very entertaining league. With high tempo matches. Players ranging from the technically gifted flair players to ones who dig in and do the job for their team's week in and week out.  

It must also be noted that Manchester United remains the club with the largest fan base in the world. With the traditions of clubs like Liverpool, United and Arsenal and the moolah that Chelsea inject into their football it is ensured that the players playing in it are the very best in the world. 

All this makes the EPL the most watched league in the world. While the Spanish league is also a very popular league I doubt that it can match up to the excitement of the Premier League. With this year the title race going down to the last match, my point is further seconded.

Now coming to the most important aspect (which, I must admit, is very dear to football critics and pundits). The quality of football.

For me this league provides the best overall package of footballing skills. We have teams which play sublime touch football. The ones who play the direct balls. The ones who counter attack at deadly pace. The point I want to make is that here you get to see a good mix of footballing ideologies.

The first point that people come up in opposition to the idea of EPL being the best is the BIG Four and the gap between them and the rest. Well to the defense of my argument let me point out that though the difference in quality is there this season we have seen the teams like West Ham, Bolton etc giving a good competition to the big four.

Then again, let me ask which league does not have this difference of quality between the top teams?

In La Liga the difference between second and third is more than evident when you see teams play. Moreover because the Spanish team's defenses are so shaky (I guess I'll be backed up on this one) that all matches are very open so we can see the lower teams being able to put (almost every time) one or two past the bigger teams.

Somehow I can't seem to buy the opinion that the Spanish league is more competent.

The case with Seria A is even worse, the gap ("a huge rift" would be a better phrase to use here)  between the top teams and the rest of the league is very evident and I don't think I need to talk you into buying this Idea.

You're currently logged into Facebook

Do you want to share your Bleacher Report activity on Facebook?