Once you get deep enough into a draft, you must temper your expectations. When the Pittsburgh Steelers went on the clock for pick No. 192, there were a number of directions they could go. What I didn’t think they would do is go a direction they had already gone in.
In selecting UCLA's Jordan Zumwalt, Pittsburgh essentially drafted the exact same player it drafted in the sixth round in 2013. Perhaps this was just an attempt to maintain synergy, but why Pittsburgh felt like it needed to draft Vince Williams version 2.0 is beyond me.
That’s not to say I dislike Zumwalt as a player. He is a fun prospect to watch. He finishes every play with energy and brings out the best in his teammates. The rub with this pick is that there were players still on the board who could have really helped this team.
Zumwalt’s game is all about energy. He’s not a terribly instinctive or athletic player. Most of his best plays are made by sheer force of will. Sounds an awful lot like Williams from last season. Could taking Zumwalt mean the coaching staff has already given up on Williams, or is it more about depth behind him? I tend to favor the latter.
What is the fit for Zumwalt? Well, it shouldn’t be terribly hard for Zumwalt to beat out a player like Terence Garvin or Daniel Molls to hold on to a roster spot. He should provide some depth behind Shazier and Lawrence Timmons on the inside along with Williams and Sean Spence.
In the final analysis, the pick spent on Zumwalt could have been used much better. And for everyone lobbying for Zumwalt, when he takes Timmons’ starting spot, you are welcome to come back here and tell me how wrong I am.
The real best-case scenario for Zumwalt early in his career could be as an ace on special teams. I can certainly see him coming downfield covering kicks with reckless abandon.
Is Zumwalt a Steeler-type of prospect? Of course he is. And odds are good that he’ll make the team. Nevertheless, in a draft that is yielding starters late, this is one of two picks on Day 3 that feel more like projects than production.
Tackles For Loss: 6.5
Passes Defended: 0
Forced Fumbles: 1