Would Tottenham Hotspur be better off if Spurs chairman Daniel Levy had not fired Andre Villas-Boas?
Sticking by Brendan Rodgers
Could Rodgers manage a big club like Liverpool?
That was the question every critic had when he managed Liverpool to 18th place after the first five league games of the 2012-13 season.
Rodgers' Liverpool finished seventh that season, 11 points behind Villas-Boas' fifth-placed Spurs.
Nowadays Villas-Boas has reunited with former Porto player Hulk at FC Zenit, while Rodgers is on course to lead Liverpool to their first-ever Premier League title.
Levy was too quick to pull the trigger on Villas-Boas, who at the time had won 53.7 percent of his league games, the best of any Spurs manager in the Premier League era, per BBC Sport.
It was a knee-jerk reaction from Levy to sack Villas-Boas.
His replacement, Tim Sherwood, has similar qualities to the manager Villas-Boas replaced (Harry Redknapp).
Sherwood Winging It
Upon replacing Villas-Boas, Sherwood had not even completed his coaching badges, per Sam Wallace at the Independent, so he was not serious on becoming a full-time manager.
Levy sacked Redknapp presumably due to his aloof demeanour to tactics.
"There are no long and boring speeches about tactics, like I was used to at Real Madrid," former Spurs player Rafael van der Vaart said, per the Sun (h/t ESPN FC). "There is a board in our dressing room but Harry [Redknapp] doesn't write anything on it."
Villas-Boas, a fastidious manager, is the antithesis to Redknapp.
So it made no sense for Levy to replace Villas-Boas with Sherwood, a Redknapp-esque manager.
Sherwood sitting in the stands during Spurs' 4-0 defeat to Liverpool and then downplaying his behaviour tells you he does not have the tactical nous required to take Spurs forward.
"I can learn more about my players sitting up top for the future than going down there to the touchline," Sherwood said, per ITV. "When you're playing against Liverpool and teams like that, I feel there was a technical mismatch between the two teams."
What about in-game adjustments? How about motivating players on the sidelines? Perhaps, manage the players?
Levy has not alleviated the situation; rather he has worsened it and will sack Sherwood for either Louis van Gaal or Mauricio Pochettino, per Jeremy Wilson and Matt Law at the Telegraph.
Levy hired Villas-Boas knowing the former treble-winning Porto manager had baggage after a premature firing at Chelsea, per David Hytner at the Guardian:
I respect the decision of the owner of Chelsea [Roman Abramovich] but I will never accept it.
I told him that for me, it was him quitting on me when he had been so much involved at the beginning in bringing me in [from Porto] and he was also [the one] who was not putting up to the things that he promised.
What reason did he give to me? I'm not sure if I can make it public but the reasons don't go along or can't be applied to the fact that I was dismissed.
Levy emulated Abramovich when dismissing Villas-Boas.
Of course, Villas-Boas' Spurs were going to hit a brick wall under those adverse circumstances.
Levy should have waited it out.
Like Liverpool management giving Rodgers another chance, Villas-Boas should have been given a chance to revive Spurs.
Statistics via WhoScored.com
Like the new article format? Send us feedback!