It was the latest in a long line of dismal performances from the Nigerian for Liverpool since his August loan switch from Chelsea.
The Decision To Sign Moses
In the summer, the transfer deadline-day signing of Moses seemed like a logical move for Rodgers, who was in need of an injection of dynamic attacking play in his team.
Moses had been outcast at Chelsea from early on but had previously been a consistent performer at Wigan. After all, his form at the DW Stadium in 2011/12 had landed him a lucrative contract at Stamford Bridge.
What Rodgers ended up with was a case of the wrong player. Having seen transfer bids for Henrikh Mkhitaryan and Willian fail miserably to the riches of Champions League clubs, Moses was essentially third choice—if that.
Moses arrived at Liverpool with high expectations—a second chance for the strong, quick and tricky player whose career was beginning to stray.
Unfortunately, Moses’ debut for the Reds at Swansea in September is still, to date, his best performance in a Liverpool shirt.
According to Squawka, since that first game in South Wales, Moses hasn’t scored in 12 Premier League games, has created just five chances, has a 50 percent shot accuracy and won just 38 percent of duels. In the air, he’s miserably won just 14 percent of headed duels.
Victor Moses, 2nd most expensive Nigerian footballer at €13m? He would be worth half by summer.— Kofo .A. Nash (@kofonash) January 3, 2014
I had high hopes for Victor Moses, thought he'd be a good loan signing. Well, safe to say I got that one wrong. As usual.— Ste H (@stehoare) January 5, 2014
Victor #Moses was pretty good before he joined Chelsea. Something's clearly happened since.— LFCZA (@LFCZA) January 5, 2014
Lack Of Desire
Patience is beginning to wear thin with Moses. Not because he’s yet to find his rhythm, as other summer signings are yet to do either, but because he genuinely looks disinterested in turning his season around.
There seems to be no desire to win himself either a permanent contract at Liverpool or an open door back to Chelsea.
It is because of this apparent attitude problem that it would be hard to justify giving him the game time to prove himself.
Furthermore, the argument that Moses has been played out of position at Liverpool is difficult to agree with.
Although he has been played in a role behind the strikers, rather than on the wing, he was always going to have to adapt to a different playing style from Rafa Benitez's to that of Rodgers. A certain degree of versatility has to be expected at the highest level of football.
With the Blues’ other loanee, Romelu Lukaku, firing on all cylinders for Everton, both Liverpool and Chelsea could be forgiven for not including Moses in their plans for the summer and beyond.
The Last Straw?
Even against League One opposition at the weekend, Moses struggled to get out of first gear.
His first touch was frankly shocking, constantly losing the momentum of attacks.
At other times, he kept himself out of the game completely and Liverpool looked thin on the ground going forward.
In his post-match comments, quoted by Chris Bascombe in the Telegraph, Rodgers hinted at his frustrations at the slow first-half performance, forcing him to replace Moses and Luis Alberto with first-team players when he would rather have rested them:
I had to do it, We needed more speed and intensity to our game.
You can either wait for it to happen or do something about it because the last thing we wanted was a replay.
Coutinho and Lucas added intensity and purpose to our game. It was a difficult game and you have to give Oldham a lot of credit for making it that way. We were nowhere near the speed of our game and in the second half we were a lot better.
If it were an option to end his loan spell earlier, would you send Victor Moses back to Chelsea?
Liverpool found deep-lying problems against Oldham in terms of a lack of squad depth and team cohesion, perhaps due to the lack of playing time this season for fringe players.
The biggest problem, however, may be deciding what to do with Moses before he goes down in Liverpool flop folklore.