UFC 165: Best Opponents for Jon Jones After Major Victory
The Swedish challenger can count himself unfortunate not to have come out on top of even one judge’s card. Jones’ hard-fought win gave the reigning champ a reminder that the rest of the division is hot on his heels.
With the win behind him, it’s onward and upward for the world’s pound-for-pound No. 1-ranked fighter, who has several particular options ahead of him for his next encounter, including a few cross-weight suggestions.
A fighter whom Jones has been going back and forth with for some time now, Daniel Cormier is somewhat of an outside bet to face the reigning champ next.
Appearing on The Jim Rome Show recently, Jones said that he “doesn’t respect him [Cormier] at all,” and that he “definitely won’t get a title shot.”
For "Bones," taking on the wrestler would be all risk and little reward. Cormier would either need to drop down to light heavyweight, or Jones would have to bulk up to move to heavyweight.
Jon Jones told me about a move to heavyweight, a possible Cormier fight, & why he's thinking of fighting a Klitschko http://t.co/52wFVKmLWC— Jim Rome (@jimrome) September 19, 2013
While the 26-year-old may have moved to dissuade the suggestion of a Cormier meeting, stranger things have happened in the UFC, so the matchup can’t be ruled out.
Gustafsson made Jones look as ordinary as ever before, showing that he is in fact human and just as vulnerable to a loss as any other fighter.
The Brazilian is right and has every reason to be confident, given the manner in which he finished off Ryan Bader three weeks ago.
Speaking on a potential fight with Teixeira, Jones is reported by MMA Fighting as saying that the South American won’t be the man to beat him, but the veteran is nonetheless among the most logical next steps for the champion.
Given the manner in which he lost to Jones, it’s not surprising to hear that Gustafsson is ready for another round with Bones.
While it may not have been expected in the build-up, Gustafsson took Jones far closer to the wire than many anticipated and gave the kind of performance that fans would almost certainly pay to see again.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?