Mayweather vs. Canelo: Money's Huge Purse Proves His Business Plan Was on Point
Take some bad press and brilliant in-ring work and then mix in great boxing genes, street smarts and sharp business instincts, and you have the Floyd "Money" Mayweather machine. Over a 17-year boxing career, a kid from less-than-ideal beginnings in Grand Rapids, Mich., has literally built himself into a cash cow who is benefiting from a great deal of the milk his talents produce.
Things haven't always been perfect, but when you'll make $41.5 million for a night of honest work, who can criticize without exposing a heavy dose of haterade in their blood?
Mayweather is guaranteed to rake in that enormous total when he faces Saul "Canelo" Alvarez on Sept. 14 at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas. No other fighter in the history of the sport has ever been guaranteed as much, per Mitch Abramson of the New York Daily News.
Everything was a business plan. My business plan was to be very, very entertaining. Be very wild. Turn it on when it’s time to turn it on, turn it off when it’s time to turn it off. And that’s what I did. I built my fan base. I became a pay-per-view star. I became a household name. That was the ultimate goal. It was just a business plan that I had.
It’s nothing fake. You’ve just got to know when to turn it on and when to turn it off. That’s what I was talking about with the young fighter in my gym, Adrien Broner.
Money has mastered the art of making himself respected by pure boxing fans, lovable enough to those not put off by his style and profitably hated by fans who can't tolerate the business plan.
In all three cases, people show up in droves to watch him perform. To quote Russell Crowe from The Gladiator: "Are you not entertained? Is this not why you are here?"
While Mayweather is my pick to defeat Alvarez on Saturday, in victory or defeat, who can call Money a loser? It is hard not to respect a perfectly executed plan.
Follow me and witness my passion for boxing and sports video games.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?