US Open Tennis 2013: Roger Federer Has Nothing Left to Prove Despite Upset Loss
Roger Federer doesnโt have anything left to prove, to you or himself, even after a disappointing exit in the Round of 16 at the 2013 U.S. Open.
After his shocking straight-set defeat at the hands of Tommy Robredo, Federer will still climb to the sixth spot in the ATP Rankings thanks to Juan Martin del Potro'sย early defeat.
You heard the statistics all summer leading up to Flushing Meadows: Federer was a fading giant. And there will be even more firsts to add to the list of his "shortcomings" on the court after his Open loss.
TOP NEWS

Zverev Wins Roland-Garros Men's Title
.png)
Mike Brown Calls Out Refs ๐

Knicks' celebrity row was star-studded for Finals Game 3
ESPN Stats and Information pointed one stunning factoid that might surprise you:
The five-time Open champion also hadnโt lost that early in the action there in over a decade. Then thereโs his second-straight failure to reach the quarterfinals of a majorโyou guessed it, another first. Surely, something is wrong with the aging star.
But who says something has to be wrong with Federer if heโs not winning every tournament in dominant fashion? The competition catches up to everyone eventually; itโs inevitable. Expecting eternal perfection isnโt a realistic outlook for anyone to carry.
The fact is his recent struggles will never marginalize what he was able to accomplish on the courts, no matter how far he slides. For the better part of a decade, Federer ruled the sport as king. His record 17 Grand Slam titles might never be broken. And his record 237 consecutive weeks as the world No. 1 probably wonโt either.
In case youโre wondering, thatโs four-and-a-half years straight that Federer was ranked as the best menโs tennis player in the world.
To be that utterly dominant, for that amount of time, is truly a testament to his acumen with a racket. He completed a career Grand Slam, winning each of the four majors at least once to demonstrate his prowess on all surfaces.
So, what should he do? Should he retire? Thatโs debatable. On one hand, heโs not the same imposing striker he used to be. But on the other, heโs not exactly rolling over and accepting his decline. Federerโs still delivering respectable showings and showing glimpses of his former self.
Whoโs to say he canโt recuperate, lessen his schedule next season and come back and win another Grand Slam in Pete Sampras-esque fashion?
Whatever ends up happening in the final chapter of Federerโs story, the history books will smile on him. He truly has nothing left to prove to anyone.

.png)





.jpg)