Bill Parcells vs. Bill Belichick: An Unfair Comparison

Fans love to compare the two legendary coaches—but that doesn't make it right, says Paul Kotch.

by Paul Kotch (Scribe)

15 comments

665 reads

April 11, 2008

Share this Story

  • Email to a friend
  • Print this article
  • Send to Facebook
  • Send to Digg
April 13, 2008

Currently UnEdited

This article has not been edited yet.

NFL, Miami Dolphins, New England Patriots, Bill Parcells, Bill Belichick, Editorial

In recent years, I’ve heard fans and analysts alike debate over who is the better coach—Bill Parcells or Bill Belichick? A fair question and a great topic of discussion. The general consensus seems to be that Belichick has surpassed his mentor with three Super Bowl titles compared to Parcells’ two. Lombardi Trophies are the measuring stick, they say—case closed.

So Belichick is obviously the better coach, right?

Wrong.

 

Bill Parcells

Parcells took over a struggling Giants’ team in 1983, replacing Ray Perkins who had left to coach at his Alma-Mater in Alabama. Within four years Parcells delivered New Yorks’ first Lombardi Trophy in 1986, and added another in 1990. Quite an accomplishment for a coach that had to contend with the likes of Mike Ditka, Joe Gibbs, and Bill Walsh every year to reach the top of the NFC mountain.

By the time Parcells left New York after the conclusion of the 1991 season, he had delivered two Super Bowl titles and three division championships.

After a two-year hiatus, Parcells took over the Patriots in 1993, replacing Dick MacPherson and picking New England up off of the NFL scrap heap. Parcells turned them into a Super Bowl contender within four years after the Patriots went 6-10 and then 2-14 respectively the previous two seasons before his arrival.

When Belichick took over in 2000, 15 players from the Parcells regime remained on the roster, including veterans Drew Bledsoe, Troy Brown, Tedy Bruschi, Ty Law, Willie McGinest, and Adam Vinatieri.

After disagreements with Robert Kraft regarding personnel decisions, Parcells came back to New York to right the Jets’ ship after Rich Kotite posted a 4-28 record.

Once again Parcells took a laughing stock of a football franchise and brought them back to respectability, taking a team that few gave a chance at a post-season birth far into the playoffs. The Jets' run culminated in an AFC Championship game as they gave the odds-on favorite and eventual champion Denver Broncos a run for their money in 1998.

Fast forward to 2003. After suffering yet another 5-11 campaign, Cowboys’ owner Jerry Jones landed The Tuna and Parcells turned around yet another bottom feeder. Parcells brought the Cowboys to the post season twice, barely losing to the Seattle Seahawks in 2006. Again, while the Cowboys didn’t produce a championship, Parcells took a team that had posted a 5-11 record three years in a row and quickly turned them into a contender.

All four teams that Parcells took over had suffered losing campaigns in the previous year, and all four reached the playoffs by year two of his tenure—something that no other coach can say.

 

Bill Belichick

Bill Belichick has all but secured his position as one of the greatest coaches of modern history, suffering only one losing season during his tenure to date in New England, going 5-11 in his first year. From 2001 to 2007, Belichick brought his team to the Super Bowl four times, winning three, and performing the unthinkable—building a dynasty in the modern day era of free agency.

His game planning against the Rams’ "Greatest Show On Turf" in Superbowl XXXVI was pure genius. While most opposing defensive coordinators had tried in vain to get to Kurt Warner and force throws underneath, Belichick alternated between sporadic blitzes with dropping additional defenders back in coverage to clog passing lanes and limit yards-after-catch.

A Rams’ offense that previously averaged 31 points-per-game was brought down to Earth and held to 17 points overall. New England capitalized on three Rams’ turnovers and cashed them in for 17 points, with Adam Vinatieri kicking the game-winner from 48 yards out. Belichick’s defense accomplished what many said could not be done—control the Rams’ explosive offense, force turnovers, and beat them on artificial turf.

Belichick’s offenses are efficient, well-oiled machines that methodically drive downfield. While they are capable of the big play, their calling card usually consists of well-built drives consisting of carefully scripted plays—each setting up the next—that consistently move the chains into the red zone. Defensively his blitz packages and diverse coverage schemes are always cutting edge innovation.

Both coaches’ teams consist of "lunch pail guys", old-school throwbacks that bring their lunch pails to work every day. Usually their teams are void of attention-seeking superstars. Disciplined football is stressed in both camps—smart, conservative play that is void of penalties on defense, and smart with the football on offense. Both like defenders with size up front, and both are intelligent enough to alter their schemes to their personnel when they know that they don’t have the players to match their preferred defensive alignments.

I don’t think that you can call Belichick the winner of this coaching derby simply because he owns more Lombardi Trophies. If Parcells remained in any one location in which he coached, he well may have picked up another. Parcells picked four different teams up off of the floor, dusted them off, and turned them into respectable, playoff-caliber franchises—a unique accomplishment that no other coach has achieved.

Nor can you state that Parcells holds the edge, because the fact that Belichick helped build a dynasty in the modern day era of free agency is nothing short of remarkable. Today’s athlete actually accepting less money to play for a team because he respects the system? That's unheard of in the 21st century. Belichick helped to script the blueprint for long-term success in the 21st century free agent market.

So before we declare a winner or loser—keep in mind that both of their situations are unique, and both have firmly secured their place in NFL history.

comments (15) write a comment »

  1. Belichick is more cerebral, Parcells is more of a people guy - a motivator

    Remember Belichick has won without Parcells, but not the other way around...

  2. But Parcells never took advantage of high definition video taping equipment either.

    1. or perhaps he simply didnt get caught!

    2. Belichick learned it from somewhere....his mentor? Naahhh...

  3. Good Read. You pose solid points about both and this is a great question for discussion. There is no loser in this debate. John brought up a good point stating that Bill Parcells hasn't won without Bill Belichick. Although If Bill Parcells remained with the Jets or more recently Dallas I have to agree things could've been different. Good Article, Paul.

    1. Thank You, Jeff
      Parcells failing to win a championship without Belichick is an excellent point, but I think we will all wonder what would have happened if Parcells remained with one club and had solid ownership support as Belichick has enjoyed.

  4. Superb Job, Paul. I enjoyed reading the article and you used some excellent facts to back up your point. No doubt both these coaches are great and Lombardi Trophies shouldnt be the only consideration taken when judging the caliber of a coach. I agree that if the tuna had consistently stayed on a team, he would have had more Superbowl rings. Lets wait and see what he can do with the Dolphins.

    1. Thanks very much - appreciate that and couldnt agree more

  5. here is the 1 constant when you compare the 2 Bills. Parcells didn't win a Super Bowl with out Belichick but Belichick won without Parcells.So i would have to give the edge to Belichick defensive coaching over Parcells so called greatness.

  6. Nice article, Paul. You really took the in-depth approach, and it turned out great!

    I agree with you. It's hard to compare two coaches of different times and situations. It's like comparing Barry Bonds and Willy Mays. There are just way too many different factors that have to be taken into account.

    1. thanks, Andrew - agreed.

  7. Great read, as a Pats fan I've seen both guys do their jobs and the way I see it is that Parcells is the better GM and Belichick is the better coach. Parcells has taken 4 bad teams and made 'em into playoff contenders, but he never stays long enough for the teams he built to become bonafide super bowl contenders. It's pretty safe to say that Dallas would have won a few more games with the Tuna than they did with Wade Phillips, Phillips' unwillingness to run Marion Barber late in the game cost Dallas the Giants game.
    Belichick has won more rings and has managed to contain the ego of Randy Moss quite effectively, he has also made super bowls with two very different kinds of teams, whether it was the juggernaut '08 team or the lunch pail '01 team, Belichick can acclimate to coaching any kind of team or player, Parcells on the other hand would often butt heads with guys like LT, creating tension in the club house.
    As I said before, great read, keep up the good work,
    Max

  8. you got my pick of the day vote by the way

  9. Great article all around I'm giving you my pick of the day vote as well

  10. To me, Parcells is more of a talent evaluator and motivation guy than a great coach. I think he needs the Belichicks around him to handle most of the Xs and Os, but he can pick a guy that fits into his system better than almost anyone.

    I'm not sure he ever got the whole salary cap thing down. Where the Belichick system builds for today and tomorrow, the Parcells system builds for today with no regard for tomorrow. Not sure that works in today's NFL...

    That said, not sure you can compare the two. Parcells never stayed anywhere long enough to see the systained success Belichick has had in New England (outside of the Giants, anyway).

    Good read...

write a new comment


Edit this Article Article History

About the Writer

Paul Kotch (Scribe)

  • 3 articles written
  • 17 comments posted
  • 6 fans

See more »

A partner of