Carrying the Torch of Tyranny

As much as I hate mixing politics with sports—and I do, believe me—it seems to happen every two to four years anyway. 

In addition to holding the most important election in the history of world democracy, 2008 is an Olympic year, and this time they’re coming to Beijing. 

Many people were upset when it was announced that China—which I call “Red China”—got the Olympics, particularly because of their almost 60-year occupation of Tibet, which they call a “peaceful liberation.” 

The ordinary folks can be seen these past few weeks demonstrating, waving Tibetan flags, holding signs, and generally being beaten up by Chinese paramilitary forces sent to guard the torch.  The powerful among the world’s elites, particularly in the IOC, care far less. 

There were many questions as to why the Games of the XXIX Olympiad were awarded to Beijing on July 13, 2001. 

Indeed, in the wake of the Nagano and Salt Lake City bribery scandals, there was certainly no shortage of extra-legal or unethical pretences.  Given the dismal human rights record of the host country and even worse environmental conditions of the host city, one couldn’t help but be quizzical. 

The only reason that would seem to remain, however, would be a sense of historical fairness among the IOC.  Indeed, China will not be the first dictatorship to receive the games, and given their sterling track record for selection, probably won’t be the last. 

The Nazis, of course, got their Olympics in 1936, which Chancellor Adolph Hitler fully intended to use as a means of promoting his racist ideals on the world stage.  All the same, Hitler prudently remembered to remove the most blatantly anti-Semitic signs from Berlin’s public squares. 

The Nazi Olympics are perhaps best remembered for Hitler’s Aryan ideal backfiring rather spectacularly when an African-American Ohio State University alumnus named Jesse Owens won four gold medals and left the "Master Race" in his dust. 

On the whole, the Games were a great success: In fact, the 1936 Olympics were instrumental in reforming both Chancellor Hitler and his regime...right? 

Not to be left out were the Soviets in 1980, who were just coming off an invasion of Afghanistan the year before.  There were protests around the world, but the IOC looked the other way and went forward with the Games many saw as legitimizing Soviet power and ignoring their abuses at home and abroad. 

The only significant form of organized protest came in the form of a US-led boycott (which may have done more harm than good; just ask all the disappointed athletes).  No matter who or how many ignored their Soviet spectacle, the Kremlin still carried on with their occupation of Afghanistan well into the 1980’s.

Now China gets their chance, despite the litany of reasons to hold the games elsewhere (or just about anywhere, for that matter).

China continues to oppress Tibetans as part of an almost 60-year occupation. 

You're currently logged into Facebook

Do you want to share your Bleacher Report activity on Facebook?