British Open 2013 Leaderboard: Live Day 4 Scores and Results
Both Phil and his caddie, Bones, called it the best round of Mickelson's career.Hard to argue that.— RonGreenJr (@RonGreenJr) July 21, 2013
Phil on winning his first Open Championship: "This is probably the most fulfilling moment of my career."— Golf.com (@si_golf) July 21, 2013
Mickelson holding his trophy.
Phil Mickelson now only needs the US Open to complete the career grand slam. He has 6 US Open runner-up finishes, most of anyone in history.— ESPN Stats & Info (@ESPNStatsInfo) July 21, 2013
Mickelson trailed by 5 entering day & won by 3 shots. Only others to do that in a major last century: Leonard '97 Open, Faldo '96 Masters.— Justin Ray (@JRayESPNGolf) July 21, 2013
For the second time on Sunday at a major, Hunter Mahan shoots 75. Did the same with Phil at Merion last month.— Golf.com (@si_golf) July 21, 2013
Westwood can finish tied for third if he makes his next putt.
Tiger Woods finishes tied for 6th after shooting a 74 in the final round.
Mickelson gets congratulated.
Phil's win will tie him with Seve at 5 majors; one behind Faldo, two behind Palmer, Sarazen and Vardon.— Matt Ginella (@MattGinellaGC) July 21, 2013
Mickelson's three-stroke lead looks pretty safe. Full leaderboard.
It has to be the most bewildering stat in sports history. Tiger Woods has never come from behind to win a major.— Kelly Tilghman (@KellyTilghmanGC) July 21, 2013
In '95, Earl Woods said Tiger'd win 14 majors. Was overreaching then. A few years later, he underestimated. Now? Could he have been spot on?— John Strege (@JohnStrege) July 21, 2013
Westwood misses the putt for par on 16.
"I'm playing some of the best golf of my career. It's the best I've ever putted." -Phil Mickelson— Kelly Tilghman (@KellyTilghmanGC) July 21, 2013
So pumped for Phil right now!!— Rickie Fowler (@RickieFowlerPGA) July 21, 2013
Mickelson has a three-stroke lead. Full leaderboard.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?