After the release of Steve Alford's buyout by the Los Angeles Times last week—it's $10.4 million, by the way—that was likely the end of what has been a noisy couple of months for Alford.
All should be relatively quiet from now until the season starts. He can focus on trying to win in his first year at UCLA.
That will not be the easiest task. Alford has a roster that is without an experienced point guard—unless you count 6'9" Kyle Anderson as a point guard—and only returns six scholarship players.
But this is the school that just fired a coach after winning the Pac-12, so expectations are never exactly tempered. It comes with the territory of coaching at a big-name program.
What should the expectations realistically be? Making the NCAA tournament should be considered a success.
Let's take a look at how other coaches who were in a similar situation to Alford's have recently fared in year one at a big-name program.
|Roy Williams (UNC)||2003-04||19-11||NCAA round of 32|
|Bill Self (Kansas)||2003-04||24-9||NCAA Elite Eight|
|Ben Howland (UCLA)||2003-04||11-17||No postseason|
|Kelvin Sampson (Indiana)||2006-07||26-7||NCAA round of 64|
|Billy Gillispie (Kentucky)||2006-07||18-13||NCAA round of 64|
|Tom Crean (Indiana)||2008-09||6-25||No postseason|
|John Calipari (Kentucky)||2009-10||35-3||NCAA Elite Eight|
|Sean Miller (Arizona)||2009-10||16-15||No postseason|
|Kevin Ollie (UConn)||2012-13||20-13||Not eligible|
Even when you're taking over a blue-blood program, it can take some time to change the culture, particularly in a situation like at UCLA, where Ben Howland had some bad seeds in his final few years.
Some of the coaches on the list above walked into a nice situation. Roy Williams had Raymond Felton, Sean May and Rashad McCants to work with, and he left Bill Self with Wayne Simien, Aaron Miles and Keith Langford. Others took over a mess (see: Tom Crean at Indiana).
Howland didn't exactly leave a ton of depth in the program, but he did leave some good pieces.
Shooting guard Jordan Adams averaged 15.3 points points per game as a freshman, and he had to battle for shots on the wing with Shabazz Muhammad.
Alford's teams have always been good on the defensive glass, and he has the luxury of utilizing Anderson's ability to rebound like a big man while playing one of the guard spots.
On the inside, UCLA has the Wear twins, who have turned into solid college players, and Tony Parker, a top -30 recruit a year ago.
Like Howland and any coach in his position, Alford deserves patience. This isn't a championship roster, and every coach should have the opportunity to get his own players on campus. Luckily for Alford, UCLA has married itself to the coach with that $10.4 million buyout.
It is worth pointing out that Alford signed a 10-year extension with New Mexico after the season. Here's Will Webber of The New Mexican's lede for his story that announced the extension on March 20:
Relax, Lobos fans, he's not going anywhere for a while.
UCLA helped cover that with a signing bonus of $845,615. What the Bruins got next was a lot of bad press.
In a twisted way, it was beneficial for Alford to get all of that out of the way right away. It was a rough start—here's a well-documented summary by Chris Foster of the Los Angeles Times—but now he can focus on basketball.
Alford will be watched with a critical eye because he's at UCLA and because his hiring didn't exactly go smoothly, but he has a chance to change those perceptions if he wins.
Like the new article format? Send us feedback!