Are David Ortiz's Career Numbers as DH Enough to Convince Bullish HOF Voters?
However, are his career numbers at DH enough to convince bullish Hall of Fame voters?
If you were to ask Boston fans if Ortiz belongs in Cooperstown, most would say, "yes." In fact, many fans outside of Boston would agree.
But as we've seen over the last four years with Edgar Martinez and from 2007-11 with Harold Baines, designated hitters don't exactly get much respect when it comes to the Hall of Fame.
Will David Ortiz make it to Cooperstown?
Martinez received his highest voting percentage in 2012 when he received 36.5 percent. However, he dropped to 35.9 percent in 2013.
Baines got even less respect, reaching a high of 6.1 percent in 2010 before failing to make the cut after the 2011 vote with only 4.8 percent of the vote.
The Baseball Writers Association of America hasn't given respect to the DH position in the past, and it's hard to think they'll give respect to it in the future.
When comparing the numbers of the three designated hitters, it's easy to see why Ortiz will end his career being considered the best DH of all time.
|Player||Games as DH||Hits||HR||RBI||AVG.||OPS|
* Ortiz's stats are through Wednesday.
While we do see Ortiz's overall numbers are far superior, they still don't rank up there with other guys who've gotten shafted by voters, much less players who have been elected.
However, if players like Fred McGriff, Larry Walker and Dale Murphy never got into Cooperstown with their numbers, there's no reason to believe Ortiz will get in.
When it comes to the Hall, voters don't take too kindly to guys who rarely (if ever) played the field.
However, if Ortiz can hang on a little longer and play into his 40s, he could reasonably put up numbers comparable to other Hall members.
He has 1,953 career hits, 420 career home runs and 1,391 career RBI. There's no doubt he'll get to 2,000 hits.
But if he can get close to 2,500 hits, hit at least 80 more home runs and drive in at least 109 more runs, he should be a shoo-in for Cooperstown.
As for now, the debate will continue about whether he deserves to be enshrined.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?