College Basketball: Which Conference Is the Best?

Andrew Lange sizes up the country's major conferences. Chime in with your thoughts—and enjoy some stats.

by Andrew Lange (Member)

4 comments

617 reads

April 09, 2008

Share this Story

  • Email to a friend
  • Print this article
  • Send to Facebook
  • Send to Digg

Currently UnEdited

This article has not been edited yet.

NCAA, SEC Basketball, ACC Basketball, Big 12 Basketball, Big East Basketball, Big Ten Basketball, Pac-10 Basketball, NCAA Tournament, NIT, 2008 NCAA Men's Tournament, NCAA Basketball, Rankings/List

I’m sure everyone has long heard debate over what conference is the greatest. Most of you have probably even joined in those debates to talk about which conferences are over-rated and under-rated.  

The point of this article is to get some hard numbers out there to compare the major conferences in Tournament competition. You will notice that I don’t care what seed you are in either tournament, the point is if you’re in either the NCAA tournament or the NIT, you’re playing against teams at the same level as you.

Why is the NIT important? I know that most of you probably don’t care about the NIT. Guess what, I don’t care about you. I’m writing the article, and I think it’s important so it’s included.

The NIT is important because it provides an idea of middle competition. Is the conference well balanced, or is the conference full of bottom feeders that the top few teams feed off of? That’s why the NIT is included in this article. 

Enough of the introduction, it’s time for some numbers. Enjoy

 

NCAA Tournament 

Baylor – Big 12 – 0-1

Kansas – Big 12 – 6-0

Kansas St. – Big 12 – 1-1

Oklahoma – Big 12 – 1-1

Texas – Big 12 – 3-1

Texas A&M – Big 12 – 1-1

Big 12 Aggregate = 12-5

 

Connecticut – Big East – 0-1

Georgetown – Big East – 1-1

Louisville – Big East – 3-1

Marquette – Big East – 1-1

Notre Dame – Big East – 1-1

Pittsburgh – Big East – 1-1

Villanova – Big East – 2-1

West Virginia – Big East – 2-1

Big East Aggregate = 11-8

 

Arizona – Pac 10 – 0-1

Oregon – Pac 10 – 0-1

Washington State – Pac 10 – 2-1

Stanford – Pac 10 – 2-1

UCLA – Pac 10 – 4-1

Southern California – Pac 10 – 0-1

Pac 10 Aggregate = 8-6

 

Duke – ACC – 1-1

Clemson – ACC – 0-1

Miami (Fla.) – ACC – 1-1

North Carolina – ACC – 4-1

ACC Aggregate = 6-4

 

Indiana – Big Ten – 0-1

Michigan State – Big Ten – 2-1

Purdue – Big Ten – 1-1

Wisconsin – Big Ten – 2-1

Big Ten Aggregate = 5-4

 

Arkansas – SEC – 1-1

Georgia – SEC – 0-1

Kentucky – SEC – 0-1

Mississippi St. – SEC – 1-1

Tennessee – SEC – 2-1

Vanderbilt – SEC – 0-1

SEC Aggregate = 4-6

 

NIT

Ohio St. – Big 10 – 5-0

Minnesota – Big Ten – 0-1

Big 10 Aggregate = 5-1

 

Mississippi – SEC – 3-1

Florida – SEC – 3-1

SEC Aggregate = 6-2

 

Syracuse – Big East – 2-1

Big East Aggregate = 2-1

 

California – Pac 10 – 1-1

Arizona St. – Pac 10 – 2-1

Pac 10 Aggregate = 3-2

 

Virginia Tech – ACC – 2-1

Florida St. – ACC – 0-1

Maryland – ACC – 1-1

ACC Aggregate = 3-3

 

Nebraska – Big 12 – 1-1

Oklahoma St. – Big 12 – 0-1

Big 12 Aggregate = 1-2

 

Conferences totals 

Big 12 = 13-7 = 65%, 3.5 average place

Big East = 13-9 = 59%, 2.5 average place

Pac 10 = 11-8 = 58%, 3.5 average place

Big Ten = 10-5 = 67%, 3 average place

ACC = 9-7 = 56%, 4.5 average place

SEC = 10-8 = 56%, 4 average place

 

The Big 12

Clearly the Big 12 is the best conference this year. With Kansas taking the National Title by beating UNC and Memphis in the final four it’s hard to disagree. Texas also added to the Big 12’s record in the Tournament. The Big 12 did not perform well in the NIT, but I can’t dock them too much for that as 50% of their conference was in the big dance.

 

The Big East

Many people feel the Big East deserves to be in first for this discussion. I disagree for a few reasons. Like the Big 12 they also got 50% of their conference in the tournament, but they only had 1 of 16 teams in the NIT, and no final four appearances in either tournament. 3 teams in the Big East made it to the Elite 8 in the two tournaments, but all teams failed to win. 2nd place goes to the Big East.

 

The Pac 10

I long debated if the Pac 10 or the Big 10 should receive 3rd place. If the decision was solely based on teams, I think that the Pac 10 would be here. If you compare UCLA, Stanford, and Washington St. against Wisconsin, Purdue, and Michigan St. I feel as though the teams are fairly close, and it would actually be a fascinating 9 game round robin tournament.

However, this list is based on tournament performance, so what it boiled down to was UCLA’s final four run, or Ohio St.’s NIT Championship. In my mind 4 wins in the NCAA Tournament is more impressive then 5 wins in the NIT, so congrats to the Pac 10 on 3rd place. 

 

The Big Ten

Well, for starters, why is the Big Ten written out, and the Pac 10 isn’t? That just doesn’t make any sense at all. The Big Ten had a little bit of a down year this year. Wisconsin exited the tournament a little early which was disappointing, and Ohio St. missed the Big Dance for the first time in awhile. Still, with 2 sweet 16 appearances, and Ohio St.’s NIT Championship the Big Ten lands 4th on this list.

 

The ACC

This probably wouldn’t be expected very often. The ACC had a big down year, failing to really do anything that was expected of them. Anything less then a National Championship for UNC was going to be a disappointment, and after an exit in the final four they disappointed. Still, UNC was the only bright spot in the ACC as Duke and Clemson got rocked in the NCAA Tournament despite their extremely generous seeds. Virginia Tech even got bounced from the NIT in the Elite 8 from their number 1 seed. 5th place belongs to The ACC.

 

The SEC

Well, after back to back Championships what can you expect? No one from the SEC did any good in the NCAA Tournament. After Tennessee beat Memphis during the regular season they were probably considered one of the favorites for the National Championship. However, after sneaking by under-seeded Butler in the 2nd round, they got knocked out by Louisville in the sweet 16. A pair of final four appearances in the NIT for the SEC, but neither team made the finals. A down year for the SEC lands them in 6th place.

Feel free to comment your own lists of what you think. I’m going by wins when they matter, in the tournaments.

comments (4) write a comment »

  1. next year no doubt about it big east is the best. MARK MY WORDS

    1. In my opinion the Big East is the best conference to watch. I loved the Big East tournament, and I loved conference play as well. I was quite sad that Marquette and Louisville didn't get as far as they could have in the tournament. Same with Syracuse, I thought they could have won the NIT. Thanks for the comment.

  2. Big 12 basketball is of a much higher quality than any other conference. The National Champion Kansas Jayhawks played a decent non-conference schedule with contests against Arizona, USC, and Georgia Tech. Even including the tournament, where did their three losses come from? That's right, all Big 12 schools. Even matched up against the 'best of the best' from other conferences in the nation, Kansas triumphed over them all. The Big 12 is a perpetual dogfight every season and not even teams like Kansas are immune to the high quality of play from every team in the league (they lost to Oklahoma State, who was '0-fer' in the NIT).

    A conference shouldn't be judged simply on it's performance in the tournaments, but by the quality of every team playing in it. How did Memphis fare in their conference? Undefeated 16-0. North Carolina? 14-2 in the exalted ACC - a conference that saw just three entries into the NCAA Tournament. And what about UCLA, the last of the Final Four? They went 16-2.

    I think Andrew is spot-on with his judgment of the Big 12 being the #1 conference in the nation. There's just more reasons than he realized.

    1. Thanks for the vote of confidence. The point of the article was to compare how the conferences did in the tournament. It's hard to say which teams are better from the regular season. Odds are that Kansas will loose to more in conference teams then out of conference teams because of the amount of times a team plays in conference compared to out of conference.

      Anyways, in my opinion performance in the tournament should dictate how good a team/conference is, not it's regular season. Pitt won the Big East tourney, probably one of the most difficult accomplishments outside of the big dance. However, they bombed in the tourney losing to Michigan St. 'Experts' had them going to the final four, but they won't be remembered for winning the Big East this year, they'll be remembered as a 2nd round bust.

write a new comment


Edit this Article Article History

About the Writer

Andrew Lange (Member)

  • 3 articles written
  • 30 comments posted
  • 0 fans

See more »

A partner of