Blackhawks vs. Bruins Stanley Cup Finals Game 4: Live Score and Highlights
Brent Seabrook scores the game-winner to give the Blackhawks a 6-5 overtime win over the Bruins. The series heads to Chicago tied 2-2.
The series heads to Chicago tied 2-2.
The game-winner by Brent Seabrook.
Seabrook. Hawks win, 6-5.— Nick Cotsonika (@cotsonika) June 20, 2013
"Let's Go Bruins!" chants keep breaking out. Now over 9 minutes into OT...^CS— Boston Bruins (@NHLBruins) June 20, 2013
Having overtime games in championship series on back to back nights is spectacular. Sports=tremendous— Josh Krulewitz (@jksports) June 20, 2013
Bruins with lots of pressure early in OT. Under 14 minutes left in the 1st OT.
Thornton with a shift early in OT. Did Claude get confused or did Thornton escape the bench?— Mike Salk (@SalkWEEI) June 20, 2013
Most overtime games in a Stanley Cup Finals series.
The NBA and NHL should issue a joint announcement that both Finals series have been extended to a best of 15— Chris Mannix (@ChrisMannixSI) June 20, 2013
And we're heading to overtime for the 3rd time this series.
Score still knotted at 5-5, off Boychuk's game-tying drive, with under 1:30 to go...^CS— Boston Bruins (@NHLBruins) June 20, 2013
We are tied at 5 with about 5 minutes to go in the 3rd.
This will be 7th Stanley Cup Final game in which a team scores 5+ goals and loses.— Jeremy Lundblad (@JLundbladESPN) June 20, 2013
This is crazy. Johnny Boychuk with the goal to tie it at 5.
Five goals won't be enough. Time for Crawford to maybe sit. His head is a mess right now.— Ken Bikoff (@kbikoff) June 20, 2013
And the Bruins get it right back! Johnny Rocket ties it!!! 5-5 with 7:46 to go in the third ^CS— Boston Bruins (@NHLBruins) June 20, 2013
Patrick Sharp with the goal off the rebound.
I didn't go to math school, but it looks like 32 seconds of 4-on-3 for Chicago, and then a 22 second 5-on-3.— SI NHL (@SI_NHL) June 20, 2013
We are 9:40 away from third OT of series.— Kevin Paul Dupont (@GlobeKPD) June 20, 2013
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?