Celtics, Clippers Reportedly Agree in Principle to Deal For Doc Rivers
After much speculation surrounding a potential move, the Los Angeles Clippers have made it official and acquired head coach Doc Rivers from the Boston Celtics, pending approval from the league.
UPDATE: Monday, June 24, at 11:55 p.m. ET by Eric Ball
Monday has come and gone, and the Clippers still don't officially have a new coach. Jackie MacMullan of ESPN Boston has the details on what's taking so long:
The official completion of the deal that will send Doc Rivers to the Los Angeles Clippers is being delayed because Rivers and his representatives are still reviewing the wording in the coach's new contract.
Rivers and his representatives also are recommending changes in the language of the three-year, $21 million deal, according to league sources.
---End of update---
UPDATE: Monday, June 24, at 5:40 p.m. ET by Tom Kinslow
Baxter Holmes of the Boston Globe has an update on the Doc Rivers trade, and it seems like the league has been unable to push the deal through as they wait for the Clippers to agree to terms with the head coach on a contract.
That source said the league has not approved any deal and the Celtics are in wait-and-see mode as Monday reaches the early evening. The Celtics have yet to cancel their scheduled press conference, which was originally set for noon and the Hall of Fame Room at the Sports Authority Practice Facility has been prepared for a press conference for three days.
---End of update---
UPDATE: Monday, June 24, at 3:30 p.m. ET by Brandon Galvin
ESPN Boston has the latest on Doc Rivers to the Clippers.
League source tells Jackie MacMullan NBA has OK'd Doc Rivers deal. Still not clear whether Celtics will hold press conference today.— ESPNBoston (@ESPNBoston) June 24, 2013
---End of update---
Jackie MacMullan of ESPN Boston has the news:
Sources confirmed on Sunday that the Clippers will sign Rivers to a three-year, $21 million contract. They will send a first-round pick as compensation for the Boston Celtics, who have agreed to release the coach from the three years, $21 million he has remaining on his deal with the club.
Contrary to previous reports, according to league and team sources, the Celtics have been complicit all along in assisting Rivers make the switch from Boston to Los Angeles.
Brad Turner of the Los Angeles Times confirmed the report, saying the deal is for a 2015 unprotected first-round draft choice.
Clippers will send 2015 unprotected pick to Celtics for Doc Rivers.— Brad Turner (@BA_Turner) June 23, 2013
Clippers will take over Rivers' contract he had left with Boston that was 3 years, $7 million per year, total of $21 million, sources— Brad Turner (@BA_Turner) June 23, 2013
However, despite the agreement in principle, Ken Berger of CBS Sports is reporting it is no guarantee that the league will approve the swap.
League office will take a skeptical view of any Rivers transaction, sources say. Will be hard to sell as separate from player discussions.— Ken Berger (@KBergCBS) June 23, 2013
With an original scenario that had included a trade for Kevin Garnett, it was noted by MacMullan that NBA commissioner David Stern has objected "to the appearance that the KG deal (for DeAndre Jordan) and Rivers were related."
ESPN's Marc Stein is also reporting that the league does not intend to budge from its original stance as it pertains to Garnett.
ESPN source says NBA does NOT intend to budge from Stern's stance & would see subsequent KG-to-Clips deal as connected & thus in violation— Marc Stein (@ESPNSteinLine) June 23, 2013
If the move for Rivers were to go through, Stein is also reporting that Chris Paul has told the Clippers that Rivers' presence in Los Angeles would secure him for the next five seasons on a max contract.
As for what Rivers' staff may look like, Adrian Wojnarowski of Yahoo! Sports is reporting that Alvin Gentry is a strong candidate, but is still in the running for a head coaching position of his own.
Alvin Gentry's a strong candidate to join Rivers' staff, but still candidate for Memphis head job and Lakers' assistant, source tells Y!— Adrian Wojnarowski (@WojYahooNBA) June 24, 2013
The Clippers, of course, won a franchise-record 56 games during the 2012-13 regular season, but after falling to the Memphis Grizzlies in the first round of the NBA playoffs, the organization decided it was time to part ways with Vinny Del Negro, electing not to renew the polarizing head coach's contract.
How would you grade this acquisition for the Clippers?
Several available names were brought up in discussions for a replacement. According to the Los Angeles Times' Broderick Turner, Lionel Hollins, Byron Scott, Brian Shaw and Nate McMillan, among others, were all given consideration.
But in the end, Los Angeles went with an "unavailable" name.
Rivers went 416-305 (.577) with the Celtics and led them to seven playoff appearances during his nine seasons. He won the NBA title in 2008 and made it back to the finals in 2010 before losing to the Los Angeles Lakers in seven games.
After that kind of success, it didn't seem Rivers was even on the brink of leaving Boston.
However, according to Wojnarowski, he didn't want to stay if the Celtics were going to get rid of Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce, thus entering rebuilding mode. There were also rumors of locker-room tension with the Celtics' new franchise player, Rajon Rondo.
This transaction continues the recent remarkable rate of overturn among head coaches, per ESPN's Tom Haberstroh:
If Doc Rivers leaves BOS, Spoelstra becomes 2nd-longest tenured coach in the NBA. Spoelstra wasn't coaching when Doc won 2008 title. Crazy.— Tom Haberstroh (@tomhaberstroh) June 16, 2013
In 2013-14, there will be 13 new head coaches, with seven of those being on playoff teams. Nevertheless, the Clippers got their man.
As long as he can help convince superstar free agent Chris Paul to stay in L.A., Rivers will undoubtedly enjoy more of that success with a very talented Clippers squad.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?