US Open Golf 2013 Leaderboard: Day 4 Scores, Results and Analysis
Justin Rose (+1) wins the the 2013 U.S. Open at Merion. Phil Mickelson (+3) finishes 2nd for a U.S Open record 6th time.
Justin Rose, all class -- shout-out to Phil Mickelson. Well done, sir.— Shane Bacon (@shanebacon) June 16, 2013
Justin Rose holds up the U.S Open trophy. It is his first major championship.
Phil Mickelson finishes +3, tied for 2nd. Mickelson's 6 runner-up finishes are the most in U.S. Open history.— SportsCenter (@SportsCenter) June 16, 2013
Phil's chip rolls by the hole to give Justin Rose the championship!
Phil leaves it well short. He needs to pitch it in to force a playoff.
Phil has one of the 11 birdies this week at 18, in the second round, but it'll be an all-timer if he makes one here.— Dan Jenkins (@danjenkinsgd) June 16, 2013
Another look at the leaderboard with just two golfers on the course.
To those who wonder about Mickelson not having a driver in his bag. His 3-wood is 8.5 degrees. That's a driver.— ByTheMinGolf (@ByTheMinGolf) June 16, 2013
Good lie in the rough for Phil, though. He'll need a career shot, and trees aren't an issue.— Brian Wacker (@pgatour_brianw) June 16, 2013
Phil is in the rough on 18.
Phil birdied 18 on Friday in the dark.— Kyle Porter (@KylePorterCBS) June 16, 2013
And Phil leaves his putt on 17 short. Has this for par and would need a birdie on 18 to force a playoff.
Really cool moment on No. 18 green by Justin Rose. Pure. One of the best even-par rounds under pressure you'll ever see.— Gene Wojciechowski (@GenoEspn) June 16, 2013
All Phil Mickelson has to do is either drain a bomb that breaks a ton on No. 17 or birdie a hole nobody has birdied yet today. Simple.— Shane Bacon (@shanebacon) June 16, 2013
Justin Rose almost holes it for birdie on 18. He pars it and finishes in the lead at +1.
Eleven birdies all week at 18--none today, and zero in the third round.— Dan Jenkins (@danjenkinsgd) June 16, 2013
Phil Mickelson misses a birdie on 16 that would have given him a share of the lead.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?