UFC 160 Drug Test Results: Brian Bowles' T/E Ratio More Than 20-to-1
UFC 160 is a few weeks behind us, but the drug test results have just become public, and things look bad for one fighter.
Former WEC bantamweight champion, Brian Bowles, returning to the cage for the first time since November 2011, was the only fighter from the May 25 fight card whose post-fight drug test came back with issues.
Bowles, who was TKO’d by George Roop in the second round of their preliminary card bout, came back with a testosterone to epitestosterone ratio of more than 20:1. The acceptable level in the state of Nevada is 6:1.
Nevada State Athletic Commission Executive Director Keith Kizer provided the drug test results to Bleacher Report via email and stated that a complaint against Bowles would be coming shortly.
Bowles had been out between 2011 and 2013 tending to injuries. The loss dropped his career record to 10-3.
Bowles has never failed a drug test in the past. It is likely that he will face a fine and suspension as a result of the failed test.
Full UFC 160 results:
Cain Velasquez defeats Antonio Silva via TKO at 1:21 of Round 1
Junior dos Santos defeats Mark Hunt via knockout at 4:18 of Round 3
Glover Teixeira defeats James Te Huna via submission at 2:38 of Round 1
T.J. Grant defeats Gray Maynard via TKO at 2:07 of Round 1
Donald Cerrone defeats KJ Noons via unanimous decision (30-27, 30-27, 30-26)
Mike Pyle defeats Rick Story via split decision (28-29, 29-28, 29-28)
Dennis Bermudez defeats Max Holloway via split decision (28-29, 29-28, 29-28)
Robert Whittaker defeats Colton Smith via TKO at 0:41 of Round 3
Khabib Nurmagomedov defeats Abel Trujillo via unanimous decision (30-27 x 3)
Stephen Thompson defeats Nah-Shon Burrell via unanimous decision (29-28, 30-27, 29-28)
George Roop defeats Brian Bowles via TKO at 1:43 of Round 2
Jeremy Stephens defeats Estevan Payan via unanimous decision (30-26, 30-26, 30-27)
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?