Mike Rice Whistleblower Reportedly Being Investigated by FBI for Extortion
Eric Murdock, who served as the whistleblower in the ongoing abuse scandal involving former Rutgers head basketball coach Mike Rice, is being investigated by the FBI for possible extortion of the university, reports Steve Eder of the New York Times.
In December, a lawyer representing the former assistant, Eric Murdock, a retired N.B.A. player, sent a letter to the university demanding $950,000, according to a copy of the letter. The letter — which was first reported by ESPN on Friday — was sent two weeks after Rice was suspended for three games for the abusive behavior that eventually led to his firing Wednesday.
Murdock was an assistant under Rice at Rutgers. His legal representation sent a letter to the university in December demanding nearly $1 million, which was not provided. He proceeded to release footage of Rice's behavior at practice, according to the report.
Now the FBI is checking into whether the letter Murdock sent to Rutgers requesting money, eventually leading to the video going public, would qualify as extortion. In the New York Times report, Eder states the investigation is in its early stages.
Murdock recently filed a wrongful termination lawsuit against the university, as reported by Christian Red and Michael O'Keeffe of the New York Daily News. In it, the former assistant alleges he was let go for raising issue with Rice's actions.
He said, "Efforts to get Rutgers to address their problems were ignored for months. Instead, I was removed from my position. That is wrong and why I filed a lawsuit."
Four Rutgers officials have resigned or were removed from their positions with the school due to the situation, according to Eder's report. An unnamed university official told the Times that FBI special agent James Tareco has been on campus recently.
The FBI, Rutgers and Murdock's representation all refused to comment on the reported investigation.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?