France vs. Spain: Who Would Win Between France 1998 and Spain 2010?
Two of the most impressive international sides of recent times, separated by a dozen years between FIFA World Cup wins: France, in 1998 on their own turf, and Spain, in 2010 in Germany.
Some of the greatest individual talents the world has seen took part in those two finals, but who would win a match if played between the two sides at their peak?
Let's first of all take a reminder of the two teams who were in action.
France '98: Barthez; Thuram, Desailly, Leboeuf, Lizarazu; Deschamps, Petit, Karembeu, Zidane; Djorkaeff, Guivarc'h.
Spain '10: Casillas; Ramos, Pique, Puyol, Capdevila; Busquets, Alonso, Xavi; Pedro, Villa, Iniesta.
France, first and foremost, possessed one of the world's best of all time in Zinedine Zidane.
His ability needs no introduction, no explanation. Zidane was the greatest of his time, perhaps, and could win a game on his own in a heartbeat.
For Spain, their two standout talents are arguably the midfield duo of Xavi and Andres Iniesta. In this national team lineup, Xavi is the most advanced central midfielder, while Iniesta took up a free roaming role from the left of the attack.
Iker Casillas was, and remains, one of the most notable goalkeepers around, while the entire team is capable and comfortable on the ball.
The great advantage that the modern-day Spain side give themselves, of course, is incredible ball retention.
A midfield almost entirely encased in Barcelona players, with the notable exception of Xabi Alonso, delights in keeping hold of the ball for huge spells at a time.
France could attack at blistering pace on the counter but were by no means solely a counterattacking side. Their power and speed down the flanks, with their progressive full-backs, meant they were able to keep bodies central in midfield as they bid to open up the opposition.
Presuming that Spain would have most of the possession in the game, the immediate most likely battles would become apparent.
In the centre, the constant rotating of positions between Alonso, Iniesta and Xavi which give so many teams problems might be countered by France's ability to pile men in front of the defence. Deschamps was more of a deep orchestrator of play than a ball-winner, but he could certainly marshal a defensive line too, and with Karembeu and Petit alongside him, there would be no shortage of work-rate.
The technical ability of those two would rival even the double pivot of Alonso and Busquets.
Where the Game Is Won
Spain tend to free their full-backs as often as possible, to stretch play and keep the opposition pressed as high up the pitch as they can.
Joan Capdevila was criticised in some quarters for not being as capable in this regard as his teammates, but he certainly knew his role and was a steady defender too, an often overlooked skill in this team.
What the France team lacks, other than in Thuram and Lizarazu, is a real pacey, direct threat in the final third. Even if their midfield would manage to crowd out the Spain buildup phases of play, unless Zidane managed to hold the ball up almost by himself, there would be too few opportunities to break forward in numbers and try to create sustained spells of attacking possession.
Leboeuf was a fine player in his own right, but against maybe the most relentless attack in the game, would his concentration have held out?
Who would win this matchup?
Villa would be presented with a chance during the match, or his movement would perhaps allow Pedro, cutting in between full- and centre-backs, the space to have a chance on goal himself.
It would be a close game, and likely not one of the classics, but Spain would just about edge this one. Iniesta, Xavi and company to win by the odd goal.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?