A Controversy Called Hawk-Eye
The Hawk-Eye system predicts the trajectory and motion of a cricket ball right from the point of its release by the bowler to a certain point behind the wickets after which the ball is considered dead.
Some argue that Hawk-Eye predicts the motion of the ball purely based on the pre-bounce behavior and so has an inherent flaw owing to the fact that the cricket ball has a “seam” around its equator and there might be chances of the ball behaving differently post-bounce.
According to them, the trajectory from the point of bounce till the wickets needs to be built from the post-bounce actions of the ball.
It is true that even if the Hawk-eye considers the post-bounce behavior and makes a projection of the motion with the aid of cutting-edge prediction strategies and statistical models, there is no possibility of arriving at 100% accurate decisions every time.
We need to understand that leg-before-wicket decisions were prone to controversies even before the advent of Hawk-Eye. A certain percentage of error is inevitable when it comes to such critical decisions since it is human to err.
There is no wonder a human-invented artificially-intelligent prediction system makes a specific amount of error while aiding the decision-making process and thus it is absurd to suspect the integrity of the Hawk-Eye system.
Somehow all these remind me of Robert Orben's saying:
"To err is human—and to blame it on the computer is even more so."
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?