NFL Draft 2013: Analyzing Mel Kiper's Latest Mock Draft
Mel Kiper of ESPN came out with his latest 2013 NFL mock draft on Thursday, complete with some no-brainers and some surprises.
Kiper has been serving as a draft analyst for ESPN since 1984, but every draft expert in the country - no matter how experienced - makes mistakes every once in a while.
Here's a look at what I believe to be the most questionable picks in Kiper's latest mock.
13. Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Manti Te'o, LB, Notre Dame
Manti Te'o isn't even a legit first-round pick for me, and it has nothing to do with the whole Lennay Kekua situation and his "character concerns."
Te'o's range (or lack thereof) is concerning to me. As a downhill tackler, he's excellent, but I worry that he doesn't possess ample sideline-to-sideline ability to be a top-15 pick in the draft. I could see the Baltimore Ravens selecting him at No. 32 overall, but this is way too early to draft the Notre Dame product, in my mind.
16. St. Louis Rams: Lane Johnson, OT, Oklahoma
I don't have a problem with the Rams selecting an offensive tackle, or Lane Johnson, but I do have a problem with them selecting Johnson ahead of Chance Warmack, which they do in Kiper's mock.
The Rams have issues all along the offensive line and Warmack could be a Pro Bowl guard down the road. You don't substitute a Pro Bowler for a player in Johnson who is simply solid.
26. Green Bay Packers: Eddie Lacy, RB, Alabama
It's hard for me to see any running back going in the first round.
Eddie Lacy is a legit second-round pick, but you don't select him as your first-rounder. I don't think he's enough of a threat in the passing game to be an every-down back and he showed some inconsistency when blocking at Alabama.
This isn't a knock on Lacy necessarily. It's just that I don't see him as a first-round prospect. I also don't think the Packers draft a running back in the first round unless they love him. We all know they're a pass-first team with Aaron Rodgers under center.
Wanna talk sports?
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?