Jamal Crawford's All-Star Push Proves Game Is Just a Popularity Contest
The fan voting for All-Star Games has been lambasted as long as it's been around, and now it looks as if the Los Angeles Clippers are attempting to turn the coach's choice for bench players into just as big a joke with their campaign for Jamal Crawford to make the All-Star Game.
Fans have been historically bad at picking the starters, and this year was no different. Dwight Howard made it in one of his most lackluster seasons, and point guards Jeremy Lin and Deron Williams were right on the cusp of breaking through.
However, the coaches are usually wise enough to put in the overlooked player who is playing exceptionally well, but isn't getting the hype because he plays in a smaller market.
Now the Clippers are trying to do the same thing to the reserves as the fans do to the starters—make it all a popularity contest.
Woike (@DanWoikeSports) January 20, 2013
I'm in no way trying to bash what Crawford has done with the Clippers this season. In fact, he's a clear-cut candidate to win the Sixth Man of the Year Award yet again, but an All-Star he is not.
The promotion that the Clippers sent out touts Crawford as a top-five player in the NBA as far as +/- is concerned, a top-five player in fourth-quarter scoring and a player with the most games scoring 20 or more points off the bench.
All that is fine, and even impressive, but is that as impressive as some of the other guards who missed the starting cut in the Western Conference?
Has he transformed the mentality of a team while putting together one of the league's top scoring seasons like James Harden?
Will he be as instrumental to the success of his team as a guy like Tony Parker or Russell Westbrook?
Hell, I would say there's a better argument to be made that Damian Lillard should be an All-Star reserve over Jamal Crawford, given the role he's played with the Portland Trail Blazers this season.
The point is that there are people out there who recognize that Crawford has done a great job coming off the bench for Los Angeles this season, and that's fine. But to go as far as to try to convince voters that a guy who is so obviously not deserving of an All-Star spot that he should be included is diluting the value of the game.
That being said, I'd love to see a one-on-one competition added to the weekend, and if Crawford were to be involved in any way, I would be absolutely stoked.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?