Avery Bradley Bringing Back Boston Celtics' Defensive Identity
Although absent from the top of the Eastern Conference standings, the Boston Celtics (18-17) are not going unnoticed by their conference peers.
And certainly not with Boston holding opponents to just 84.8 points per game since the return of third-year guard Avery Bradley.
With Bradley and Rajon Rondo back together in the Celtics starting backcourt, Boston has bothered opponents from even entering their offensive sets. The Celtics might not boast an intimidating eraser at the rim, but they won't need one with team's initiating their plays late in the shot clock.
The hurried offenses of Boston opponents has resulted in the following field-goal percentages during the winning streak: 31.8 (Indiana), 41.2 (Atlanta), 40.8 (New York) and 39.3 (Phoenix)
A 6'2", 180-pound defensive-stopper may not be the prototypical franchise savior, but with Bradley back in the mix (he missed the season's first two months recovering from surgery on both shoulders), coach Doc Rivers has found the balance his rotation had been lacking.
As the Celtics stumbled through the early goings of the year, Bradley might not have been the missing piece.
But Boston looked far removed from being 100 percent:
CelticsBlog (@celticsblog) January 8, 2013
With Bradley back in the mix, Rivers has new strings to pull.
He can go heavy on defense, as he does with that starting Bradley-Rondo combo. He can balance either of his starters with marksman Jason Terry or the slashing Courtney Lee.
Neither Bradley (career 5.7 points per game) nor Rondo (11.0) are going to regularly rip nets. But that's why Paul Pierce is on the floor.
The Celtics might lack the imposing frontcourt of the Garnett-Kendrick Perkins days, but Bradley and Rondo are as frustrating of a defensive tandem as opposing guards will encounter.
With Boston guards limiting the length of opposing possessions, Rivers' offensive-minded players might only need 10 seconds of strong defense to finish a successful trip.
If Boston can keep getting strong defensive showings from their backcourt, they'll continue their ascent up the conference standings.
Of course, this club's dangerous no matter where they're slotted.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?