Should the Celtics Call a Players-Only Meeting?
Jorge Sierra of HoopsHype wrote an interesting post today about the effect of players-only meetings on team's record. While he recognizes the two basic issues with this analysis (i.e. limited sample & correlation does not mean causality), it's interesting that on average such meetings have produced positive results. To be specific, in 10 of the cases it yielded positive results, in 1 the short-term benefit was cancelled during the rest of the season, and in 4 things took a turn for the worse. I believe that such meetings actually do work, and further statistical analysis shows that it produces significant positive results at least in the short run.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?