This is tongue-in-cheek here, folks. Wallace took a lot of flak last year for his interview with Roger Clemens, in which he clearly was NOT at the top of his game. He's a big name, certainly, but he's a soft touch these days, and a personal friend of Clemens, which was exactly why Roger chose him for the interview.
He violated two of the three classic journalism blunders, the most famous of which is 'never get involved in a land war in Asia.' Only slightly less well known are 'ask tough questions' and 'make sure you can remain objective.'
Besides, even if Mike Wallace did want to learn about HGH, do you think he would actually risk talking to Jose Canseco about it? He may be old and crotchety and not much of an interviewer anymore, but the man is not stupid.
Jose Canseco wrote a book three years ago and is publishing another one in which he supposedly divulges confidential information form personal conversations with people who trusted him at the time. Why would Wallace confide in this guy?
Getting back to Canseco, I read and reviewed his book Juiced as well, and found it mostly pretty interesting, but that was because it was chocked full of what were (at the time) mostly new revelations.
This new one, whether Lavin actually read it or not, appears to be just an effort by Canseco to make a few bucks by jumping on the bandwagon. Though it should be noted that he started this whole thing by pushing that bandwagon down the hill three years ago. At the time, many of his accusations were based on first hand experience of injecting or supplying other players, though now it just sounds like he's accusing anyone who's a big name and might make a splash for his book to get some press.
I've already got a couple of other books to review, both of which seem like they'll be more interesting and better written than Canseco's new offering, and I won't even get to them until I've gotten through Baseball Prospectus 2008 and drafted my fantasy team.
I expect that Canseco's sequel to Juiced will be a lot like The Matrix: Revolutions and everything Erik Hinske's done since he won the 2002 AL Rookie of the Year—a lot less interesting, and only still there because there's a lot of money involved.















0 Comments
Loading more comments...
This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete