Arsenal Postpone Boxing Day Match Against West Ham United
For the second straight year, Arsenal have been forced to cancel their Boxing Day match.
This season's match was scheduled to be played against fellow London side, West Ham United.
The official statement from the club's website cites the potential strike of the workers on the London Underground as the reason for the postponement of the match.
Here is more from the club's statement on the difficulty of having fans get to the Emirates Stadium on Boxing Day.
"In addition to the proposed industrial action on London Underground on Boxing Day, there are extremely limited services operating on National Rail into London on this day. Also, normal parking restrictions close to the stadium still apply. This would have caused severe disruption, or at worst, inability for supporters or matchday employees and workers to get to Emirates Stadium."
- Arsenal Football Club, December 19, 2012
The same issue arose last season and the Gunners were forced to push their fixture with Wolves back one day.
Should The Arsenal-West Ham Match Have Been Postponed?
However, the rescheduling of the West Ham fixture will not occur the day after Boxing Day, it will be played on two at the end of January.
If the two clubs are eliminated from the FA Cup in the third round fixtures on Jan. 5 and Jan. 6, then the match will be played on Saturday, Jan. 26.
If one or both of the clubs advance to the fourth round of the prestigious cup competition, the match will be rescheduled to be played on Wednesday, Jan. 23.
The postponement of the match will give both the Gunners and Hammers a valuable rest during the busy holiday fixture list, where every club in the EPL were scheduled to play four league matches and one FA Cup match in a two-week period.
Is Arsenal doing the right thing by postponing their Boxing Day fixture with West Ham?
Comment below or leave me a comment on Twitter @JTansey90
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?