Ryan Ludwick Signing Will Benefit the Cincinnati Reds Most in 2013
The Cincinnati Reds haven't done a whole lot this offseason.
General manager Walt Jocketty went into the 2012-13 offseason needing a left fielder and a leadoff hitter. Thus far, he's only fulfilled one of these needs with the re-signing of 34-year-old left fielder Ryan Ludwick.
The only move with any real substance this offseason is the re-signing of Ryan Ludwick.
Ludwick pulled together a great bounce-back season in 2012, slashing .275/.346/.531 with 26 HR, 55 XBH, 80 RBI and 53 runs scored.
Most impressive about Ludwick's season was the way he performed in Joey Votto's absence. Ludwick slashed .347/.421/.660 with 12 HR and 36 RBI.
The Reds' move to bring him back ensures production in one of the most important spots of a team's lineup.
Providing Ludwick produces similarly to the way he did in 2012, his being in the four hole ensures that Joey Votto will get plenty of pitches to hit.
The effect this has on the Reds' lineup is immeasurable.
With Ludwick back in the middle of the Reds' lineup, it also allows Dusty Baker to put Brandon Phillips in the two hole, where he's arguably a more valuable player.
Although this was a great signing for the Reds, the most important move has yet to be made.
The Reds desperately need a leadoff hitter, and it seems that the only way to acquire one (outside of doling out big bucks for Michael Bourn) will be through a trade.
I've been against both Jacoby Ellsbury and Dexter Fowler, because of the proposed costs of each both in terms of trade value and, in Ellsbury's case, of keeping him around past 2013.
One could argue that the most important move of the Reds' offseason is yet to be made. However, in practice, the re-signing of Ryan Ludwick is easily the most beneficial signing of the 2012-13 offseason.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?