The Giants Aren't Necessarily Committed to Angel Pagan

From on November 23, 2012

506 reads

0Icon_comment

Hi-res-154847671_crop_north
Ezra Shaw/Getty Images

One of the assumptions about the Giants heading into the winter was that they were going to basically keep the roster together, and that included re-signing Angel Pagan. But you know what they say about those who assume.

Flag
Props (0)
This article is

What is the duplicate article?

Why is this article offensive?

Where is this article plagiarized from?

Why is this article poorly edited?

Flag This Article
San Francisco Giants San Francisco Giants: Like this team?
Default-user-icon-comment
or to post a comment

0 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment
Big
Loading comments...
just now posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

Follow the San Francisco Giants from B/R on Facebook

Follow the San Francisco Giants from B/R on Facebook and get the latest updates straight to your newsfeed!

Fans of

Icon_subscribe
Icon_youtube
Icon_google
San Francisco Giants

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address

Thanks for signing up.

We're Scouting Top Writers

Top 100 Pitchers in Baseball Hint: you can use arrow keys to navigate through this channel.