Boston Celtics vs. Brooklyn Nets: Live Analysis, Score Updates, Highlights
The Brooklyn Nets top the Boston Celtics 102-97.
After some bizarre coaching decisions to foul down the stretch, the Brooklyn Nets escape with a big win over the Rondo-less Celtics.
What in hell are the Nets doing!? Fouling up four with some 20 seconds to go? Ridiculous.— J.E. Skeets (@jeskeets) November 16, 2012
Tune-in alert: Paul Pierce just hit two free throws to cut Brooklyn's lead to 99-97 with 19.1 seconds left in regulation.— Boston Celtics (@celtics) November 16, 2012
Wow, Pierce hits a triple to give the C's a second life.
Pierce misses TWO free throws down 3!
Deron Williams hits two clutch free throws to give the Nets a 3-point lead.
Jeff Green pulls up and buries a corner trey. C's within 1.
Here's the details on the Nets crunch-time offense. These have been the details on the Nets crunch-time offense.— devin kharpertian (@uuords) November 16, 2012
Joe Johnson has arrived in Brooklyn and he's got the Nets up 6 on Boston withunder 2 minutes to go.— Dime Alert (@DimeAlert) November 16, 2012
Joe Johnson's 1st points of the 2nd half put the Nets back in the lead.
For those of you not in Barclays Center just be aware you are missing the hipsterest thing that ever hipstered right now— devin kharpertian (@uuords) November 16, 2012
Stackhouse ties it up on a corner three. Crowd immediately starts changing, "Brooklyn! Brooklyn! Brooklyn!"
Joe Johnson had 16 points in the fourth quarter yesterday. Would be nice— devin kharpertian (@uuords) November 16, 2012
Deron Williams has 18 and 7 for Brooklyn and Kris Humphries has a 10-11 double-double.— Dime Update (@DimeUpdate) November 16, 2012
The Celtics dominate the 3rd 29-15 to take a 5-point lead into the 4th quarter.
For you underperformance fans: Joe Johnson is 3-13 from the field while Jeff Green has taken only 3 shots in 14 minutes.— Dime Alert (@DimeAlert) November 16, 2012
Pierce flipped the switch in the 3rd.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?