Derek Dooley: What Tennessee Coach's Uncertain Future Means for Recruiting
Tennessee Volunteers head football coach Derek Dooley's future with the program is uncertain, and that's going to really impact the recruiting process for the program.
It's never a good thing when a coach's status with the program is up in the air. It leads to confusion, division and an overall lack of direction—and if there's anything that turns away major recruits, it's all three of those things.
But the fact of the matter remains that Dooley's future as head coach of Tennessee is in jeopardy, and even he knows it, according to John Brice of VolQuest.com:
No timetable had been established of when a change could be made, but multiple people extremely close to the Tennessee program on Monday indicated that Dooley made clear to his team in an emotional, teary meeting that he did not know his future as head coach of the Vols or if he would even get the opportunity to finish out this season. Dooley has compiled a 15-20 schedule across two-plus seasons in Knoxville since he was hired to replace Lane Kiffin on Jan. 15, 2010.
What does this mean for Tennessee recruiting?
Let's take a look at the pros and cons of firing Dooley:
Tennessee will also have to factor in the possibility of losing 2013 commits who may feel loyal to Dooley. The Volunteer's 2013 class is ranked No. 21 by Rivals.com and has six four-star recruits committed, so they're going to have to risk losing some of those commitments if indeed they fire Dooley.
That said, the positives may actually outweigh those negatives.
No matter how you look at it, Dooley is directly responsible for the win and loss column. A great example of that would be five-star running back Derrick Henry, who committed to Alabama over Tennessee (and Georgia).
We'll never know for sure, but could the Volunteers have had a better shot at landing Henry if their record was better on the field?
There's also the excitement and buzz a new coach and new direction would cause for Tennessee, which can be used to not only keep the recruits they have, but perhaps draw in a few more.
Being part of a new movement can be a huge selling point for a high school football player, and Tennessee could pitch the future of their program as being much brighter. With Dooley at the helm, they don't necessarily have a leg to stand on, with regards to that statement.
Bringing in a new face for the program could really impact Tennessee recruiting in a far more positive way than losing Dooley would impact it negatively, especially if that coach is a big name.
Gruden has a Super Bowl under his belt and is one of the more recognized and well-liked coaches in America, so he'd undoubtedly be a huge selling point with Tennessee.
This is, of course, just some of the speculation with regards to Gruden (and there's a ton of it right now), but the premise remains plausible that a new coach would do wonders for Tennessee recruiting.
Either way you look at it, recruiting is going to be affected.
One thing is for sure, though: in the here and now, Tennessee needs to figure this out soon.
The uncertainty will only serve to hurt the Volunteers, from a recruiting standpoint.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?