Tim Tebow Spotted on Date with Reported Girlfriend Camilla Belle
Tim Tebow is dating.
Let's all just pause for a moment while the world freaks out and bedlam ensues, if only for just a moment.
TMZ is still on the pulse of what the people want, and we all want to know who Tebow, age 25, is dating. Reportedly, it's 26-year-old actress Camilla Belle, former girlfriend to pop singer Joe Jonas.
We finally have closure to the great mystery surrounding Tebow's love life, just in time for the remaining Tebow fanatics who haven't lost interest by now.
The hype and hoopla of "Tebowmania" has devolved into something more along the lines of "Tebowcuriosity," perhaps even "Tebowpassinginterest."
Either way, the most famous backup quarterback finally has a gal, according to the report.
Tim Tebow has finally scored -- problem is, it's off the field -- because TMZ got the first pic showing Tim with his hot new girlfriend/actress, who is no stranger to famous virgins.
Tim and Camilla Belle showed up at Latitude 30 in Jacksonville, Florida Tuesday night, where they bowled and partied.
Where there is bowling, there is romance.
Belle's past roles include playing Evolet in 10,000 BC, Cathy Bowman in The Lost World: Jurassic Park, and Nora Dominguez in From Prada to Nada.
As for Tebow, he has appeared in such NFL moments as the Denver Broncos 2011 playoff run and the great New York Jets debacle of 2012.
Both highly entertaining.
While we take the report with a grain of salt, there was one source who was completely sold that the pair are a hot item.
People who were at Latitude 30 last night tell us ... Tim and Camilla were overly affectionate throughout the evening, holding hands and touching.
Camilla's rep didn't get back to us, but sources connected with Camilla tell us they are definitely an item.
There you go, world.
Tim Tebow, Mark Sanchez's understudy, now has a girlfriend. Consider your world flipped upside down and your reality shook.
Things will never be the same.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?