Liverpool News: Nuri Sahin Should Be Long-Term Target for Brendan Rodgers
"I don't look beyond the loan period because there are lots of things which will determine whether [Sahin] ever came here [permanently]," Rodgers told reporters.
"One has to be availability. Jose may decide after one year playing he is really the type of player he wants around his squad.
"Two: He might not be affordable. Affordability is important as well. We'd all love Lionel Messi but whether you can afford him or he's available is another thing."
While those things are undoubtedly true, Rodgers shouldn't hesitate in making Sahin, at the very least, a long-term target, regardless of the fact that in the end, Jose Mourinho will hold the negotiating power.
The 24-year-old midfielder, who broke onto the national scene as one of Germany's best players with Borussia Dortmund before flaming out because of injuries with Real Madrid, was a serious risk coming to Anfield.
Would he return to his Borussia form? Or would his injuries continue to hold him down in one of the world's top leagues?
Well, it's still early, but I'm pretty sure those questions have been emphatically answered.
Sahin already has three goals in four appearances across all competitions and has drawn praise as a "master technician" from Rodgers.
How many years will Nuri Sahin spend with Liverpool?
Because of Sahin's history, a loan was a good way for Liverpool, a team in need of impact players for a discount, to kick the tires. Consider the tires kicked, and consider said kicking successful.
It's clear that, without the pressure and in-team competition that comes from being at Real Madrid, Sahin is back to the top form he displayed when leading Dortmund to a Bundesliga title. Not only is he benefiting from a new setting, but Liverpool, which still clearly needs help on other parts of the pitch, is benefiting from his arrival.
This should be the beginning of a beautiful relationship.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?