Oklahoma City Thunder logoOklahoma City Thunder

Should the Oklahoma City Thunder Consider Amnestying Kendrick Perkins?

OKLAHOMA CITY, OK - JUNE 14:  Kendrick Perkins #5 of the Oklahoma City Thunder reacts in the second half while taking on the Miami Heat in Game Two of the 2012 NBA Finals at Chesapeake Energy Arena on June 14, 2012 in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement.  (Photo by Ronald Martinez/Getty Images)
Ronald Martinez/Getty Images
Preston DeGarmoAnalyst IOctober 1, 2012

When Sam Presti acquired Kendrick Perkins in a trade with the Boston Celtics, he expected the center to be the final piece in making the Oklahoma City Thunder legitimate contenders.

While the Thunder have surely risen to contender status, their ascent has hardly been due to the efforts of Perkins. In fact, the big man has so greatly underperformed that he is arguably more of a liability than an asset. He now looks like a potential amnesty candidate for the Thunder.

But with Dwight Howard now sporting a Lakers jersey, can the Thunder afford to dump their supposed defensive anchor?

Perkins first gained league-wide recognition for his stellar defensive play against Howard while playing for the Celtics. And while he has since lost a step due to injuries and age, he remains a presence due to his strength and toughness.

Whether they like it or not, the Thunder will have to defeat Howard and the Lakers in order to have any hope of winning an NBA title. And though Serge Ibaka has proven to be an excellent shot-blocker, he cannot hope to guard Howard as effectively as Perkins has in the past.

But while Perkins may have value as a stopper against Howard, his offensive shortcomings outweigh the defensive boost he provides.

Despite playing nearly 27 minutes per game last season, Perkins averaged just five points per game while shooting at a relatively poor percentage for his position, especially considering he rarely shot outside of the rim area.

Furthermore, Perkins posted an abysmal 8.69 PER, miles below the average of 15. Not only did he put up mediocre numbers, but he was also terribly inefficient while doing it.

Considering his increasingly weak production, Perkins no longer looks worthy of playing big minutes for the Thunder, especially given their style of play.

The Thunder must accept that they are not going to beat the Lakers on the inside. OKC’s three best players thrive on the perimeter, and that is where it must outdo the Lakers.

Rather than allowing the Lakers to repeatedly feed Howard with post-ups and keep the game moving at a crawl, the Thunder must play to their own strengths and seek to neutralize Howard’s impact by attacking in transition and forcing perimeter play.

While Perkins may be the best option to defend Howard one-on-one, the Thunder’s best defense may be a fast and explosive offense. That cannot be achieved with an astonishingly slow and offensively inept center lumbering around the court. 

Perkins’ value must also be considered in comparison to 2012 Sixth Man of the Year, James Harden. Deserved or not, Perk makes close to eight million dollars next season, which takes a major chunk out of the Thunder’s financial flexibility.

This is especially relevant given the uncertainty surrounding Harden’s future in OKC. Harden will be a restricted free agent next summer, and if left unattended, is sure to command a maximum contract from interested teams.

Amnestying Perkins would give the Thunder a significant boost in cap flexibility, greatly improving their chances of retaining Harden at a price worthy of his talents.

Despite his flaws, Perkins does have value as a post defender and rebounder, and he is a significantly better option than the other true centers on OKC’s roster (Cole Aldrich and Hasheem Thabeet). Though his numbers were pretty terrible last season, he can make the Thunder a better team if given a more logical role.

But are Perkins’ contributions substantial enough that they justify missing out on the prime years of a rising star in Harden? 

Should the choice come down to Perkins or Harden, the Thunder must stick with Harden and trust in Ibaka and Nick Collison to do just enough to slow Howard down in the post so that the Thunder’s dynamic perimeter trio can work their magic.  

Don’t be surprised if the Thunder opt to amnesty Perkins next season. While the team would ideally be able to keep him on board as a stopper in the post, OKC’s priority should undoubtedly be retaining Harden, and Perkins is the most logical casualty in the quest to do so.

Where can I comment?

Stay on your game

Latest news, insights, and forecasts on your teams across leagues.

Choose Teams
Get it on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Real-time news for your teams right on your mobile device.

Download
Copyright © 2017 Bleacher Report, Inc. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved. BleacherReport.com is part of Bleacher Report – Turner Sports Network, part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Network. Certain photos copyright © 2017 Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited. AdChoices