NCAA Tournament: Not in Love With the No. 3 Seed
University of Wisconsin had a shot at a No. 2 last year and that went horribly, maybe the change of scenery at No. 3 will be helpful. But that's one hell of a 6/11 match up we're looking at; either we get Mayo (20.8 ppg) and USC, or Beasley (26.5 ppg, 12.4 rpg) and Kansas State.
Still, these stars are just freshmen, and with an experienced senior like Michael Flowers taking responsibility for these stars, there's a pretty good chance for UW to make the Sweet Sixteen.
I'll say it's a 98 percent chance to win against Cal State-Fullerton and 60 percent to move on to the next weekend. Choosing between Gonzaga, Davidson, and Georgetown is no fun, but I do think Georgetown is ripe for the picking.
An Elite Eight would be an incredible achievement for the team that was supposed to finish fifth in the conference.
That said, I believe that despite their lower seeds, Michigan State and Purdue have easier opposition on their way to the second weekend (high seeds they'll face will be No. 4 Pitt and No. 3 Xavier, respectively).
Poor Indiana got hosed, not just with a No. 8 seed, but drawing UNC in the first weekend?
I really thought the Buckeyes were going to make the field too.
Can we blame Georgia for that?
I'd like to blame Georgia.
Tough break for Matta's crew. I guess they did need a Big Ten Tournament win after all.
Let's not speak of the hockey team. If they luck into a postseason berth it'll be a miracle—and their stay will be brief. You drop one game to St. Cloud in your last fifteen tries and then get SWEPT in the WCHA playoffs? Pathetic.
Anyway, hoops on Thursday and Saturday this weekend. Go Badgers!
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?