Do you remember the red line?
Instead of 2-1 and 3-2 games, skilled players would be able to send passes up the ice and set up teammates with breakaways and other odd-man rushes. Those low-scoring games would become high-scoring 4-3 or 5-4 games.
It hasn't happened that way. Instead of getting more breakaways and scoring opportunities, teams are just playing more dump-and-chase hockey—and they are doing it from a longer distance.
Prior to the red-line change, 5.136 goals were scored in the 2003-04 season. There was a slight bump in scoring after the rule was implemented, but scoring was at the 5.320 mark during the 2011-12 season, according to QuantHockey.com.
"I don’t like the way the game is played anymore,” Yzerman told Tampa Bay Times columnist Damian Cristodero. “All the rule changes we made we designed to increase the skill level, but it’s become a slap shot from the far blue line and a guy chips it in and you go chase.”
The safety factor also comes into play if the red line were to come back into play. Speedy players often accelerate when they get into the neutral zone as they hope to accept a pass so they can go into the offensive zone and create a scoring opportunity. With their head turned as they look for the puck, players become vulnerable to cheap-shot artists who are looking for an unsuspecting player to destroy.
Put the red line back, and players like Savard would be less likely to turn their heads and put themselves in a vulnerable position.
While head shots like the one Cooke delivered to Savard will now result in serious penalties and suspensions, reinstitution of the red line could help make the game safer.
Safety remains a key issue in all contact and collision sports, especially hockey. Any change that makes the game safer deserves consideration.
Since taking away the red line did not have the desired impact on goal scoring, it's time to reinstitute the red line. It would require more skill from puck-carriers and help prevent needless head shots and other illegal hits.