Should the WWE Put on Fewer PPVs?

Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse more stories

The WWE is currently over saturated with pay-per-views.  Or are they? 

With pay-per-view buyrates sinking over the years as a result of an increased diet of these box office offerings, could there be possible reasons as to why the WWE could be justified in continuing to load up on pay-per-views?

The WWE continues to find a relatively healthy source of revenue with monthly events such as WWE Money in the Bank and WWE Over the Limit. However, they seem to be carried annually by cash-cow, big-four franchises such as the Royal Rumble and WrestleMania. 

Some argue that WWE may be better off scrapping all non-big-four events in favor of classic pay-per-views to facilitate the build-up process while giving what would be quarterly pay-per-views a big-fight feel. 

Others argue the business aspect of the WWE necessitates an environment where the worldwide leader must collect as much pay-per-view revenue as possible. 

 

Join Big Nasty and Justin LaBar as they take opposing views on this always controversial topic. 

Follow Big Nasty on Twitter @ThisIsNasty.

Follow Justin LaBar on Twitter @JustinLaBar.

Load More Stories

Out of Bounds

WWE

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address

Thanks for signing up.