Should the WWE Put on Fewer PPVs?

Alfred Konuwa@@ThisIsNastyFeatured ColumnistSeptember 7, 2012

The WWE is currently over saturated with pay-per-views.  Or are they? 

With pay-per-view buyrates sinking over the years as a result of an increased diet of these box office offerings, could there be possible reasons as to why the WWE could be justified in continuing to load up on pay-per-views?

The WWE continues to find a relatively healthy source of revenue with monthly events such as WWE Money in the Bank and WWE Over the Limit. However, they seem to be carried annually by cash-cow, big-four franchises such as the Royal Rumble and WrestleMania. 

Some argue that WWE may be better off scrapping all non-big-four events in favor of classic pay-per-views to facilitate the build-up process while giving what would be quarterly pay-per-views a big-fight feel. 

Others argue the business aspect of the WWE necessitates an environment where the worldwide leader must collect as much pay-per-view revenue as possible. 

 

Join Big Nasty and Justin LaBar as they take opposing views on this always controversial topic. 

Follow Big Nasty on Twitter @ThisIsNasty.

Follow Justin LaBar on Twitter @JustinLaBar.

Related

    TNA Loses Its TV Deal in the UK

    Pro Wrestling logo
    Pro Wrestling

    TNA Loses Its TV Deal in the UK

    Corey Jacobs
    via Wrestling News

    Twitter Reacts to Top Stars and Moments of Clash of Champions

    Pro Wrestling logo
    Pro Wrestling

    Twitter Reacts to Top Stars and Moments of Clash of Champions

    Erik Beaston
    via Bleacher Report

    Clash of Champions Highlights and Low Points

    Pro Wrestling logo
    Pro Wrestling

    Clash of Champions Highlights and Low Points

    Anthony Mango
    via Bleacher Report

    Biggest Stars of Clash of Champions

    Pro Wrestling logo
    Pro Wrestling

    Biggest Stars of Clash of Champions

    Kevin Wong
    via Bleacher Report