College Football Week 1 Predictions: SEC Primed to Continue Decade of Dominance
There have been a few constants in college football in the last decade, and one is that the Southeastern Conference will put forth more talented teams than the rest of the country, bar none.
It’s hard to believe so much talent can be gathered in one conference year after year, but there’s no denying the disparity. (Many argue a few teams from the SEC could hold their own against NFL competition.)
With the start of the 2012 college football season on the immediate horizon, it’s a fun time to look ahead and imagine what teams can make a spirited run toward the Bowl Championship Series.
An SEC team won the BCS National Championship in each of the last six seasons. In addition, 2011 saw them make history by having two teams from the same conference square off in the big game.
I’m here to say the SEC is not going anywhere, and Week 1 will prove just that.
LSU looks to be the most talented team in the SEC at the start of the season, even with the recent dismissal of star defensive back Tyrann Mathieu. LSU will run the ball effectively, and quarterback Zach Mettenberger will be an upgrade from last year.
With that said, LSU won’t be the only ranked team from the SEC rolling this week. Alabama may have the biggest test in the opening weekend, having been slotted to play No. 8 Michigan in Ann Arbor, but it has too much firepower for Brady Hoke’s bunch. It will be closer than people realize, but the defending champs will win by two touchdowns on Saturday night.
South Carolina and Georgia, two supremely talented defensive teams, will make easy work of their unranked opponents this weekend. And No. 23 Florida, while still not in the upper echelon of the SEC, will take care of business against Bowling Green.
It’s certainly early to be thinking about the BCS and which teams possess the talent to get there. But the SEC is a different animal than the rest of college football's conferences, and will kick off 2012 in dominant fashion.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?