Tottenham Transfers: Spurs Target Chelsea's Meireles, Reportedly out on Moutinho
It looks like Andre Villas-Boas has turned his sights away from one former player and toward another.
AVB knows both Moutinho and Meireles from his time at Porto and Chelsea, respectively. In fact, both were brought into their respective clubs under AVB's reign.
The pursuit of both players is clearly an attempt to bolster the side's creative force, which is set to take a major hit with the impending sale of Croatian midfielder Luka Modric to Real Madrid.
However, the Mirror has suggested that the £30 million price tag Porto put on the midfielder might be too steep for Spurs.
In an interview on the topic, AVB said:
On Moutinho, I have experience of Porto - it is a club that sells expensive, but they sell a good product.
They have a pride on defending that kind of brand. They know what sells from them triumphs at other clubs.EuroFootball/Getty Images
It has been like that with numerous amounts of players and that is why it is very difficult.
Now, the quote does not do much to suggest that Tottenham is stopping their pursuit of Moutinho. Further, such a suggestion could be a bargaining tool by AVB as he waits for the money from Modric's transfer to arrive.
Add on to this that this is not being reported anywhere but the Mirror and that Moutinho just today said that he would be tempted by an offer to come to White Hart Lane (per Metro), and one is right to be skeptical on the report.
Still, any and all developments on the situation could be important hints about the future of this potential move.
Meanwhile, AVB's pursuit of Meireles makes quite a bit of sense. Last summer, Villas-Boas signed the Portuguese player for Chelsea in a deadline-day transfer for just £12 million. With Meireles becoming slightly disgruntled and falling out of favor at Stamford Bridge after AVB's sacking, the Blues could be open to the deal.
With Modric gone, Spurs could do with both Meireles and Moutinho in the middle of the park.
Hopefully, both can find a home at White Hart Lane.
For the latest news in the world of football, follow me on Twitter.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?